| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Beverly Hills Cop III: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This page is very well done. Kudos to whoever re-vamped it. However, I'm very disappointed in the fact that the worst film in the series (yes, it is the worst, you can't deny it) got so much attention from this website, while the first two films (the best two) are extremely poorly done. They REALLY need to be re-vamped (especially "Beverly Hills Cop 2"). -[[User:Gunman69|Gunman69]] 00:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | This page is very well done. Kudos to whoever re-vamped it. However, I'm very disappointed in the fact that the worst film in the series (yes, it is the worst, you can't deny it) got so much attention from this website, while the first two films (the best two) are extremely poorly done. They REALLY need to be re-vamped (especially "Beverly Hills Cop 2"). -[[User:Gunman69|Gunman69]] 00:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Then why don't you 'cap the first movies, Gunman?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 01:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:16, 1 July 2009
Gold Cup Notional Match
The first picture under that head, I see no way of identifying it as a GCNM clearly, but the sight appears to be to far forward for a GC. The second picture however definitely is a Gold Cup.
Beverly Hills Cop 1 & 2
This page is very well done. Kudos to whoever re-vamped it. However, I'm very disappointed in the fact that the worst film in the series (yes, it is the worst, you can't deny it) got so much attention from this website, while the first two films (the best two) are extremely poorly done. They REALLY need to be re-vamped (especially "Beverly Hills Cop 2"). -Gunman69 00:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Then why don't you 'cap the first movies, Gunman?-Oliveira 01:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)