| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Saw (2004): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Smith & Wesson== | ==Smith & Wesson== | ||
There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm | There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm certain the gun is still indeed a Model 686. Compare the 'screen-used' gun image with that of a 66 and it's clear the frame shape and size isn't exactly the same (which would fit). As for the 'note': Early-version 686s featured rounded cylinder releases, and the sights were slightly different. These parts, along with the hammer, are/were shared across several S&W models. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 22:46, 26 October 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 27 October 2020
Smith & Wesson
There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm certain the gun is still indeed a Model 686. Compare the 'screen-used' gun image with that of a 66 and it's clear the frame shape and size isn't exactly the same (which would fit). As for the 'note': Early-version 686s featured rounded cylinder releases, and the sights were slightly different. These parts, along with the hammer, are/were shared across several S&W models. StanTheMan (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2020 (EDT)