| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Khaspush: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The first unidentified revolver is most likely an early (pre-Mark VI) [[Webley revolver]]. The second one could be an [[Adams revolver]], maybe a cartridge conversion? --[[User:Dan San|Dan San]] ([[User talk:Dan San|talk]]) 15:39, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | The first unidentified revolver is most likely an early (pre-Mark VI) [[Webley revolver]]. The second one could be an [[Adams revolver]], maybe a cartridge conversion? --[[User:Dan San|Dan San]] ([[User talk:Dan San|talk]]) 15:39, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
:The second unidentified revolver is hardly an Adams as it has a different trigger guard and seemingly different grip, also this revolver seems to have a rib over the barrel. I had an idea about [[Webley No.5]] that has a similar barrel but it also differs in details. The first revolver may be an early Webley but it also can be an S&W model. It just isn't seen clear enough to make a sure guess. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:50, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | :The second unidentified revolver is hardly an Adams as it has a different trigger guard and seemingly different grip, also this revolver seems to have a rib over the barrel. I had an idea about [[Webley No.5]] that has a similar barrel but it also differs in details. The first revolver may be an early Webley but it also can be an S&W model. It just isn't seen clear enough to make a sure guess. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:50, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
::I thought it could be a Webley given the context (British guards, early 20th century), but I know that's not always a reliable method. I don't know, something about it really strikes me as a Webley... --[[User:Dan San|Dan San]] ([[User talk:Dan San|talk]]) 22:09, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | |||
I think that Berdan actually may depicts Chassepot because of the very high resemblance. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 18:19, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | I think that Berdan actually may depicts Chassepot because of the very high resemblance. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 18:19, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
One of the revolvers suspiciously resembles Pieper M1893. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 18:29, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | One of the revolvers suspiciously resembles Pieper M1893. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 18:29, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
:The M1893 is a carbine, though --[[User:Dan San|Dan San]] ([[User talk:Dan San|talk]]) 22:09, 31 August 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:09, 1 September 2020
The first unidentified revolver is most likely an early (pre-Mark VI) Webley revolver. The second one could be an Adams revolver, maybe a cartridge conversion? --Dan San (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
- The second unidentified revolver is hardly an Adams as it has a different trigger guard and seemingly different grip, also this revolver seems to have a rib over the barrel. I had an idea about Webley No.5 that has a similar barrel but it also differs in details. The first revolver may be an early Webley but it also can be an S&W model. It just isn't seen clear enough to make a sure guess. --Greg-Z (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
I think that Berdan actually may depicts Chassepot because of the very high resemblance. --Slon95 (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
One of the revolvers suspiciously resembles Pieper M1893. --Slon95 (talk) 18:29, 31 August 2020 (EDT)