| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Face of the Frog: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Yes, the barrel puzzled me also. If not for this part, I would be sure for Mle 1892, as the vertical front of the frame, the unsupported rod and the large hammer - all match the French revolver. Maybe this piece was simply damaged. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT) | ::Yes, the barrel puzzled me also. If not for this part, I would be sure for Mle 1892, as the vertical front of the frame, the unsupported rod and the large hammer - all match the French revolver. Maybe this piece was simply damaged. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT) | ||
:: I also have some doubt about MP3008: the part with pistol grip below the tubular slide differs in shape than on MP3008 (and all Stens), resembling something like [[Gevarm Type D4]]. Also, if I see correct, the top part of the folding stock is horizontal, again unlike Sten family. Really, don't know, maybe all this is only a visual error. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT) | :: I also have some doubt about MP3008: the part with pistol grip below the tubular slide differs in shape than on MP3008 (and all Stens), resembling something like [[Gevarm Type D4]]. Also, if I see correct, the top part of the folding stock is horizontal, again unlike Sten family. Really, don't know, maybe all this is only a visual error. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT) | ||
::: More screenshots of the revolver (unfortunately it can often be seen in rapid motion) and the second SMG. I hope they are more helpful--[[User:HighPhigh|HighPhigh]] ([[User talk:HighPhigh|talk]]) 12:10, 18 July 2020 (EDT) | |||
[[File:EdgarWallaceFrosch-rev1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
[[File:EdgarWallaceFrosch-rev2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
[[File:EdgarWallaceFrosch-SMG2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Right side.]] | |||
[[File:EdgarWallaceFrosch-SMG3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
[[File:EdgarWallaceFrosch-SMG3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
Revision as of 16:10, 18 July 2020
The unidentified revolver resembles a French Mle 1892 Revolver but I'm not sure. --Greg-Z (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2020 (EDT)
- This could be, but with a shorter barrel without the front sight. I'll keep that in mind and try to get a better screenshot of it. Thank you! --HighPhigh (talk) 11:16, 18 July 2020 (EDT)
- Yes, the barrel puzzled me also. If not for this part, I would be sure for Mle 1892, as the vertical front of the frame, the unsupported rod and the large hammer - all match the French revolver. Maybe this piece was simply damaged. --Greg-Z (talk) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT)
- I also have some doubt about MP3008: the part with pistol grip below the tubular slide differs in shape than on MP3008 (and all Stens), resembling something like Gevarm Type D4. Also, if I see correct, the top part of the folding stock is horizontal, again unlike Sten family. Really, don't know, maybe all this is only a visual error. --Greg-Z (talk) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (EDT)
