| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Stoner 63: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | =Additional Images= | ||
[[File:Stoner63.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early Stoner 63 Rifle (XM22) with wooden furniture. 234 Stoner 63s were produced like this at the Cadillac Gage small arms development facility in Costa Mesa before production was moved to Warren, Michigan in September 1964 and the furnishings switched to polycarbonate - 5.56x45mm]] | [[File:Stoner63.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early Stoner 63 Rifle (XM22) with wooden furniture. 234 Stoner 63s were produced like this at the Cadillac Gage small arms development facility in Costa Mesa before production was moved to Warren, Michigan in September 1964 and the furnishings switched to polycarbonate - 5.56x45mm]] | ||
[[File:Stoner 63 Rifle.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Stoner 63, Assault Rifle configuration - 5.56x45mm]] | [[File:Stoner 63 Assault Rifle.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Stoner 63, Assault Rifle configuration - 5.56x45mm]] | ||
[[File:Stoner 63 Automatic Rifle.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Stoner 63, Automatic Rifle configuration - 5.56x45mm]] | |||
[[File:Stoner 63A Carbine.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Stoner 63A, Carbine configuration - 5.56x45mm]] | |||
[[File:Stoner 63A Commando Left Feed.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Stoner 63A, Commando configuration - 5.56x45mm. This example feeds from the left and is equipped with the left-feeding drum.]] | |||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
Revision as of 01:30, 16 October 2019
Additional Images
Discussion
WRONG PHOTO
That photo of a so called Cadillac gauge M 63 is not a Stoner at all, but a Robinson M96 expeditionary Rifle. MoviePropMaster2008 21:37, 11 August 2011 (CDT)
- Do you want me to ask my friends if they can get a photograph of a Stoner weapons System from someone who owns one or has taken photograps of one? It would most likely be copywrited but i think i can get a few.Rockwolf66 22:06, 11 August 2011 (CDT)
- I might have a solution in the works. :) MoviePropMaster2008 01:45, 12 August 2011 (CDT)
- As for my 'solution', it was a bust. The Stoner I wanted to photograph turned out to be highly customized. Something I don't want on IMFDB at all if it never appeared in the configuration. Curses. What is it with people who have to Mall Ninja everything they touch? :( MoviePropMaster2008 14:01, 12 June 2012 (CDT)
Stoner 96 and LMG
Should not we combine the KAC LMG and the Stoner 96 section? They are the same guns, as far as I know. - bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:14, 26 April 2012 (CDT)
- I actually think they are COMPLETELY different... http://www.knightarmco.com/lmg.html I think the KAC LMG should have its own page... --Zackmann08 19:20, 14 May 2012 (CDT)
- Hmm, I still think they are the same. The "KAC LMG" was based on the Stoner 63, it is even mentioned on the page you posted.--bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:53, 12 June 2012 (CDT)
Shouldn't we take the Stoner 96 off this page? It's not really related to the Stoner 63. I think it should be put on the KAC LMG page, because on the link displayed above me (the one for the KAC LMG) it says it's the Stoner LMG. Jeddostotle7 20:03, 22 July 2012 (CDT)