| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:AT-13 Saxhorn-2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Original Russian name or NATO reporting name?== Should we use the original Russian designation or the NATO designation to name this weapon? (this discussion also applies to ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Original Russian name or NATO reporting name?== | ==Original Russian name or NATO reporting name?== | ||
Should we use the original Russian designation or the NATO | Should we use the original Russian designation or the NATO reporting name to name this weapon? (this discussion also applies to the [[AT-4 Spigot]], the [[AT-5 Spandrel]], and the [[AT-14 Spriggan]]) I think we should use the original Russian designation since the NATO reporting names are code names, used in place of their original names. Even though we speak English on this site, we're not NATO, and I think we should use the original names. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 01:45, 8 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:48, 8 August 2018
Original Russian name or NATO reporting name?
Should we use the original Russian designation or the NATO reporting name to name this weapon? (this discussion also applies to the AT-4 Spigot, the AT-5 Spandrel, and the AT-14 Spriggan) I think we should use the original Russian designation since the NATO reporting names are code names, used in place of their original names. Even though we speak English on this site, we're not NATO, and I think we should use the original names. --Wuzh (talk) 01:45, 8 August 2018 (EDT)