| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Lethal Weapon 4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
AdAstra2009 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, take those out. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 03:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | :Yes, take those out. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 03:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Type 56-1== | |||
Note: Not an AK-47 as originally thought, not with the folding stock, and considering the fact that the sight was most likely hooded, it must be a Type 56-1. | |||
:I don't think it's a Type 56. The Type 56-2 (which is the version with the side-folding stock) has a different stock design than that. The Type 56 also retains the smooth receiver cover of the older AK-47 models (as opposed to the strengthened ribbed design of the AKM), but that rifle looks like it might have a ribbed one. East German MPiKMs ''do'' have stocks that look like that and ribbed receiver covers, so I'm guessing it might be one of those. I would need to see the front sight, as well as the receiver, in better detail to figure out whether it's a Type 56. | |||
::It's either an East German or Romanian side folding stock. It has to be an AKM, not a Type 56, because the side folding stocks don't fit on the Chinese receivers. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] | |||
[[Image:Type56S.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Norinco Type 56-1]] | |||
[[Image:Type56-2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Norinco Type 56-2 (side-folding stock variant) - 7.62x39mm]] | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 11 June 2009
That poster in the police office is insulting and stupid, as it says "All CIVILIAN assault weapons should be banned", and then shows four civilian guns that are considered "assault weapons". - Gunmaster45
- Yes, take those out. Excalibur01 03:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Type 56-1
Note: Not an AK-47 as originally thought, not with the folding stock, and considering the fact that the sight was most likely hooded, it must be a Type 56-1.
- I don't think it's a Type 56. The Type 56-2 (which is the version with the side-folding stock) has a different stock design than that. The Type 56 also retains the smooth receiver cover of the older AK-47 models (as opposed to the strengthened ribbed design of the AKM), but that rifle looks like it might have a ribbed one. East German MPiKMs do have stocks that look like that and ribbed receiver covers, so I'm guessing it might be one of those. I would need to see the front sight, as well as the receiver, in better detail to figure out whether it's a Type 56.
- It's either an East German or Romanian side folding stock. It has to be an AKM, not a Type 56, because the side folding stocks don't fit on the Chinese receivers. MoviePropMaster2008
