| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:PK Machine Gun: Difference between revisions
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
::There are a few obvious external differences as well due to the totally different way in which the UKM-2000 feeds. Essentially, the chamber needs to be a few inches further forward so the receiver of the UKM-2000 is extended to accommodate this, sort of having an extra section just ahead of the feed tray pivot which is a new latch for the barrel. There are other differences in the feed tray, the most externally obvious of which are the removal of the spring loaded cover, lugs to fix the rail to even if it is missing, and simpler machining on the sides without the PKM's distinctive rib. The UKM-2000 also has a different, less upside-down AK shaped gas block. If you do a side by side comparison of a [http://www.imfdb.org/images/e/e5/HungarianPKM.jpg PKM] to a [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/UKM2000P_REMOV.jpg UKM-2000] you can see these differences more clearly. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 15:50, 2 December 2016 (EST) | ::There are a few obvious external differences as well due to the totally different way in which the UKM-2000 feeds. Essentially, the chamber needs to be a few inches further forward so the receiver of the UKM-2000 is extended to accommodate this, sort of having an extra section just ahead of the feed tray pivot which is a new latch for the barrel. There are other differences in the feed tray, the most externally obvious of which are the removal of the spring loaded cover, lugs to fix the rail to even if it is missing, and simpler machining on the sides without the PKM's distinctive rib. The UKM-2000 also has a different, less upside-down AK shaped gas block. If you do a side by side comparison of a [http://www.imfdb.org/images/e/e5/HungarianPKM.jpg PKM] to a [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/UKM2000P_REMOV.jpg UKM-2000] you can see these differences more clearly. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 15:50, 2 December 2016 (EST) | ||
Thank you commando552.--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 16:40, 2 December 2016 (EST) | Thank you commando552.--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 16:40, 2 December 2016 (EST) | ||
And forget to say that this explanations will be a lot useful for me and hope for others --[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 16:44, 2 December 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 21:44, 2 December 2016
Other PK Machine Gun variants
PKB Variant with Spade Grips
I was wondering if anyone on the Internet Movie Firearms Database community has any photos of this rarer variant. It is apparently the same type of weapon used by the former Soviet military and now Russian and other post-Soviet states in their armored vehicles. What makes it unique from the infantry or tank versions is that the PKB machine gun featured spade grips and the thumb button of older machine guns instead of the stock and pistol grip layout. Was at least used since the Soviet-Afghan War of 1979 - 1989 as helicopter weaponry (door and window armament for the Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopter). Despite frequent use I have not found many details in books or on the web on this variant. Maphisto86 (talk) 00:32, 19 August 2013 (EDT)
Go to page 11 here: http://www.forgottenweapons.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/PK-Series-manual-English-2005.pdf AgentGumby (talk) 01:28, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- Although it is probably a mock up (have heard of people making them out of a PKT with the solenoid replaced by grips from the SG-43) there is one of these in the first set photos for Expendables 3. --commando552 (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
Bullpup PKP
I'm not entirely sure this is a good idea o_O
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/e1/1d/93/e11d9353482e2e3f35756a629a2d31cc.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/94/9a/ef/949aef7abcde4e30d99d430910f1d431.jpg
Evil Tim (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
Other not-in-site variants
For example how can I tell the difference between a UKM-2000 and a PKM? --Dannyguns (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2016 (EST)
- The difference is more internal than external. The main difference is disintegrating ammunition belt on UKM instead of non-disintegrating belt on PK. Most modern version of UKM (UKM-2013) is fitted with a telescopic buttstock and Picatinny rail. Greg-Z (talk) 15:15, 2 December 2016 (EST)
- There are a few obvious external differences as well due to the totally different way in which the UKM-2000 feeds. Essentially, the chamber needs to be a few inches further forward so the receiver of the UKM-2000 is extended to accommodate this, sort of having an extra section just ahead of the feed tray pivot which is a new latch for the barrel. There are other differences in the feed tray, the most externally obvious of which are the removal of the spring loaded cover, lugs to fix the rail to even if it is missing, and simpler machining on the sides without the PKM's distinctive rib. The UKM-2000 also has a different, less upside-down AK shaped gas block. If you do a side by side comparison of a PKM to a UKM-2000 you can see these differences more clearly. --commando552 (talk) 15:50, 2 December 2016 (EST)
Thank you commando552.--Dannyguns (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2016 (EST) And forget to say that this explanations will be a lot useful for me and hope for others --Dannyguns (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2016 (EST)