| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Cleopatra Jones: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links: new section) |
m (→Takedown rifle) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I still need to fix the links for two images (Diamondback and prop MP40), have no clue why they don't work. Will do so on the weekend, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 03:16, 22 January 2016 (EST) | I still need to fix the links for two images (Diamondback and prop MP40), have no clue why they don't work. Will do so on the weekend, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 03:16, 22 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:I fixed the problem, there were minor typos in file names. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 03:28, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
== Colt == | |||
Are you sure that the Colt revolver is a Diamondback, and not a Python? I have some doubt about it. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 03:28, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
:I understand, but I used a visual comparison and based on below 4 points, I figured this revolver to be a Diamondback. | |||
# shape of top section of grip | |||
# shape of the trigger guard | |||
# space between cylinder and frame | |||
# length/dimensions of vented ribs | |||
However, should you have better proof that this is a Python, please let me know and I will change, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 06:34, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
[[Image:CleopatraJones-ColtDiamondbackPython.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
::Thanks I got it. No more questions. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 06:56, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
== Takedown rifle == | |||
Given the ring, and the fact that almost all takedown rifles in film at the time were Arisakas, maybe an Arisaka? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 07:29, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
:Hah, you beat me again! You're right about the Arisaka. With [[Dirty Harry]] being one of my favorite movies I should have known better. This also explains the other unidentified rifle, which is the Arisaka put together, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 15:13, 22 January 2016 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:13, 22 January 2016
Links
I still need to fix the links for two images (Diamondback and prop MP40), have no clue why they don't work. Will do so on the weekend, PeeWee055 (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2016 (EST)
- I fixed the problem, there were minor typos in file names. Greg-Z (talk) 03:28, 22 January 2016 (EST)
Colt
Are you sure that the Colt revolver is a Diamondback, and not a Python? I have some doubt about it. Greg-Z (talk) 03:28, 22 January 2016 (EST)
- I understand, but I used a visual comparison and based on below 4 points, I figured this revolver to be a Diamondback.
- shape of top section of grip
- shape of the trigger guard
- space between cylinder and frame
- length/dimensions of vented ribs
However, should you have better proof that this is a Python, please let me know and I will change, PeeWee055 (talk) 06:34, 22 January 2016 (EST)
Takedown rifle
Given the ring, and the fact that almost all takedown rifles in film at the time were Arisakas, maybe an Arisaka? --Funkychinaman (talk) 07:29, 22 January 2016 (EST)
- Hah, you beat me again! You're right about the Arisaka. With Dirty Harry being one of my favorite movies I should have known better. This also explains the other unidentified rifle, which is the Arisaka put together, PeeWee055 (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2016 (EST)