| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:In the Line of Duty 7: Sea Wolves: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I'm sorry, I don't understand: are the first and third revolvers the snub nose S & W model 10? Right? But, what is the second revolver and second pistol? May this pistol beeng some from Sig-Sauer series? How do you think, is I'm right or not? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 11:27, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | ::I'm sorry, I don't understand: are the first and third revolvers the snub nose S & W model 10? Right? But, what is the second revolver and second pistol? May this pistol beeng some from Sig-Sauer series? How do you think, is I'm right or not? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 11:27, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::I think the S&W 36 is a S&W 10, and I don't think that's a SIG-Sauer at all. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:52, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | :::I think the S&W 36 is a S&W 10, and I don't think that's a SIG-Sauer at all. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:52, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::The semi-auto looks like an early Beretta model, perhaps a 92SB?.. --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] ([[User talk:Warejaws|talk]]) 14:24, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
The second image of unidentified revolver makes me think that it's possible to be Browning Hi-Power. The front side of the barrel looks similar to HP. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 12:45, 21 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
I think the revolver is non-firing replica, considering the scene, and how ridiculous this thing is looks. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 10:55, 23 March 2021 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 23 March 2021
Let's do this the easy way: I think the only IDs that are correct are the first and the last. --Funkychinaman (talk) 08:12, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm sorry, may you help me with another ID? Pyramid Silent (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Before I do, can you explain some of your IDs? I'm curious. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- The second pistol are shapes as Sig_Sauer p220 series. I thinc, that the first revolver is S & W, due it's appears in the hands of Hong-Kong police. Revolver owned by Vietnamese are looks like the same, and it's had S & W logo. Second revolver shape are looks like a SAA, but also may be Ruger Vaquero. And I think, that third revolver is S & W model 10, due it's look very simialtenesly at the second screenshoot. Pyramid Silent (talk) 09:45, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Before I do, can you explain some of your IDs? I'm curious. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- "The second pistol are shapes as Sig_Sauer p220 series." - Most pistols are shaped like that. That also doesn't explain how you got to the P229 either. The pistol is too long to be a P229.
- "I thinc, that the first revolver is S & W, due it's appears in the hands of Hong-Kong police. Revolver owned by Vietnamese are looks like the same, and it's had S & W logo." - You're right, it is an S&W, but making the ID simply because it's the RHKP is careless. Take a look at the third and fifth caps, and you can see the cylinder holds six rounds. So, S&W revolver, six shots, snub nosed, fixed sights, what does that give you?
- "Second revolver shape are looks like a SAA, but also may be Ruger Vaquero." - SAAs are rather distinct, with the ejector rod to the right of the barrel, the ejector rod in the caps are directly under the barrel. The revolver in the caps also has adjustable sights, which most SAAs do not have.
- "And I think, that third revolver is S & W model 10, due it's look very simialtenesly at the second screenshoot." - You're close, I'm not sure why you didn't use the image of the snub-nosed S&W 10. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:19, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm sorry, I don't understand: are the first and third revolvers the snub nose S & W model 10? Right? But, what is the second revolver and second pistol? May this pistol beeng some from Sig-Sauer series? How do you think, is I'm right or not? Pyramid Silent (talk) 11:27, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- I think the S&W 36 is a S&W 10, and I don't think that's a SIG-Sauer at all. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm sorry, I don't understand: are the first and third revolvers the snub nose S & W model 10? Right? But, what is the second revolver and second pistol? May this pistol beeng some from Sig-Sauer series? How do you think, is I'm right or not? Pyramid Silent (talk) 11:27, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
The second image of unidentified revolver makes me think that it's possible to be Browning Hi-Power. The front side of the barrel looks similar to HP. Greg-Z (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
I think the revolver is non-firing replica, considering the scene, and how ridiculous this thing is looks. --Slon95 (talk) 10:55, 23 March 2021 (EDT)