| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Beretta ARX-160: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Additional Images == | |||
[[File:Arx-160 CQB Coyote brown.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Beretta ARX-160 Coyote brown with 11.89" barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]] | |||
[[File:ARX160.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Beretta ARX-160 with M68 Aimpoint red dot sight and 11.89" barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]] | |||
[[File:BerettaARX160.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Beretta ARX-160 with RIS foregrip and Leupold CQ/T scope - 5.56x45mm NATO]] | |||
[[File:ARX-100.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Beretta ARX-100, the civilian version of the ARX-160 - 5.56x45mm NATO]] | |||
[[File:ARX-160 .22.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Beretta ARX-160 - .22 Long Rifle]] | |||
==Talk== | |||
This looks like one of those horrible G36 / M4 crack-babies videogame companies are always making. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:08, 22 January 2012 (CST) | This looks like one of those horrible G36 / M4 crack-babies videogame companies are always making. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:08, 22 January 2012 (CST) | ||
:I think it looks badass... at least they put some effort into the design that way it is not a 100% AR-15 clone. :) - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:27, 22 January 2012 (CST) | :I think it looks badass... at least they put some effort into the design that way it is not a 100% AR-15 clone. :) - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:27, 22 January 2012 (CST) | ||
:::Same here, I really like the design (even if it might look bulky from some angles). [[:File:SpecFor 109.jpg|This]] a badass view lol. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 07:33, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | |||
::It's so bulky looking, but not nearly as fat as the F2000 though. [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] ([[User talk:Mr. Wolf|talk]]) 16:28, 19 October 2015 (EDT) | ::It's so bulky looking, but not nearly as fat as the F2000 though. [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] ([[User talk:Mr. Wolf|talk]]) 16:28, 19 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
Is not a bulky weapon, and I see it almost every day --[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 17:06, 2 December 2016 (EST) | |||
== Caliber conversion == | == Caliber conversion == | ||
I keep hearing that this will be in 6.8 SPC, 5.45x39, and even .300 Blackout (with a .308 version in the works). The only calibers I ''know'' the things exists in is 5.56 and 7.62x39. Can anyone confirm where or when the ARX might be available in these other calibers? | I keep hearing that this will be in 6.8 SPC, 5.45x39, and even .300 Blackout (with a .308 version in the works). The only calibers I ''know'' the things exists in is 5.56 and 7.62x39. Can anyone confirm where or when the ARX might be available in these other calibers? | ||
[[User:PhillipC93|PhillipC93]] ([[User talk:PhillipC93|talk]]) 21:11, 18 October 2015 (EDT) | [[User:PhillipC93|PhillipC93]] ([[User talk:PhillipC93|talk]]) 21:11, 18 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
Yes a 7,62 exist, is called ARX-200, it work like a sniper rifle, and is the one lesslikely to see if you go to Italy, (as terrorism fear, they are soldier everywhere, most with ARXs but someone with a SC-70/90 in some metro stations), and can be adapted 6,8 SPC since is modular design --[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 17:03, 2 December 2016 (EST) | |||
== Why this gun doesn't appear in media anymore? == | |||
Thats weird. Is even adopted by Italian and Argentine Army. Should be super popular now.--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 11:21, 5 February 2018 (EST) | |||
:Well it is kind of silly looking. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 13:11, 5 February 2018 (EST) | |||
:Is made by Italians. Is normal. :)--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 08:08, 6 February 2018 (EST) | |||
== ARX-160 or ARX160? == | |||
Searching on Google, IMFDB seems to be one of the few major websites that puts a dash between ARX and 160. Wikipedia uses ARX160, and Beretta USA uses ARX160. Should we rename this to Beretta ARX160? --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 12:24, 21 November 2018 (EST) | |||
:I've been asking myself the same question. There's another similar issue: IMFDB is also one of the websites that label the MG34, MG42, MG3 as such, whereas in many others there's a space between MG and the corresponding number. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 05:52, 22 November 2018 (EST) | |||
::I'm in favor of renaming to ARX160. --[[User:HeadAllTheWayUpIt|HeadAllTheWayUpIt]] ([[User talk:HeadAllTheWayUpIt|talk]]) 13:40, 5 April 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:40, 5 April 2020
Additional Images
Talk
This looks like one of those horrible G36 / M4 crack-babies videogame companies are always making. Evil Tim 01:08, 22 January 2012 (CST)
- I think it looks badass... at least they put some effort into the design that way it is not a 100% AR-15 clone. :) - bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:27, 22 January 2012 (CST)
- Same here, I really like the design (even if it might look bulky from some angles). This a badass view lol. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
- It's so bulky looking, but not nearly as fat as the F2000 though. Mr. Wolf (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2015 (EDT)
Is not a bulky weapon, and I see it almost every day --Dannyguns (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2016 (EST)
Caliber conversion
I keep hearing that this will be in 6.8 SPC, 5.45x39, and even .300 Blackout (with a .308 version in the works). The only calibers I know the things exists in is 5.56 and 7.62x39. Can anyone confirm where or when the ARX might be available in these other calibers? PhillipC93 (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2015 (EDT)
Yes a 7,62 exist, is called ARX-200, it work like a sniper rifle, and is the one lesslikely to see if you go to Italy, (as terrorism fear, they are soldier everywhere, most with ARXs but someone with a SC-70/90 in some metro stations), and can be adapted 6,8 SPC since is modular design --Dannyguns (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2016 (EST)
Why this gun doesn't appear in media anymore?
Thats weird. Is even adopted by Italian and Argentine Army. Should be super popular now.--Dannyguns (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2018 (EST)
- Well it is kind of silly looking. Evil Tim (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2018 (EST)
- Is made by Italians. Is normal. :)--Dannyguns (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2018 (EST)
ARX-160 or ARX160?
Searching on Google, IMFDB seems to be one of the few major websites that puts a dash between ARX and 160. Wikipedia uses ARX160, and Beretta USA uses ARX160. Should we rename this to Beretta ARX160? --Wuzh (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2018 (EST)
- I've been asking myself the same question. There's another similar issue: IMFDB is also one of the websites that label the MG34, MG42, MG3 as such, whereas in many others there's a space between MG and the corresponding number. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 05:52, 22 November 2018 (EST)
- I'm in favor of renaming to ARX160. --HeadAllTheWayUpIt (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2020 (EDT)