|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Reply ==
| |
|
| |
|
| Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| * First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Moved:
| |
|
| |
| _______
| |
|
| |
| ::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| ::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| ::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::: "Hard no" - after "Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk"... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| ::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| ::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words "Atari Jaguar" onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art. You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference. If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)
| |
