| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Last Ship - Season 1: Difference between revisions
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) (→AKs) |
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Last Ship, The - Season 1 to Talk:The Last Ship - Season 1 over redirect: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== AKs == | == AKs == | ||
I do not think these are really AK-103s as they appear to have the old style of gas block rather than the AK-74 type one used on the AK-100s series. Rather, I think they are jusy AKMS dressed up as AK-74Ms by adding polymer furniture and a muzzle brake. Also, I can't remember what episode it was in, but there was one where some of the AKs were actually SA Vz.58s (think it might have been the one where they boarded the Russian ship to rescue the Captain but can't remember). There is actually a picture of one up on the main page already:[[File:LastShipS1E07 06.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]]The guy on the right has an [[SA vz. 58P]], but I seem to remember there were more than just this one in the episode. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:08, 31 August 2014 (EDT) | I do not think these are really AK-103s as they appear to have the old style of gas block rather than the AK-74 type one used on the AK-100s series. Rather, I think they are jusy AKMS dressed up as AK-74Ms by adding polymer furniture and a muzzle brake. Also, I can't remember what episode it was in, but there was one where some of the AKs were actually SA Vz.58s (think it might have been the one where they boarded the Russian ship to rescue the Captain but can't remember). There is actually a picture of one up on the main page already:[[File:LastShipS1E07 06.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]]The guy on the right has an [[Sa vz. 58 P|SA vz. 58P]], but I seem to remember there were more than just this one in the episode. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:08, 31 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
Additionally, you can clearly see in the pic of Chandler holding one that there's no hinge for the stock to fold, so yeah, these are just dressed up AKMs. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 20:26, 23 November 2014 (EST) | Additionally, you can clearly see in the pic of Chandler holding one that there's no hinge for the stock to fold, so yeah, these are just dressed up AKMs. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 20:26, 23 November 2014 (EST) | ||
== 2nd P226 image == | |||
The description for the 2nd P226 image says that he is holding a P228 and that it is likely a stand in for the real P226. Two things, one, if it was a P228, wouldn't we make a separate section stating that in a continuity error or something the character was using a 228 instead of a 226? Two, that is not a 228. Look at the barrel length and trigger guard, neither are right for a 228, but are quite correct looking for the 226. I can't quite tell if it has rails on the frame so it may not be the same as the others, but I'm pretty sure that it is definitely a 226.--[[User:1911isthebestgunever|One shot is all it takes.]] ([[User talk:1911isthebestgunever|talk]]) 12:54, 7 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
: I concur given the slide length and the 'hooked' trigger guard this is a P226 and not a P228.. that said it definitely doesn't have the accessory rail and looks to have the older stamped slide making me think it's an earlier standard 226 standing in for the 'Navy' model, in which case the '228' could just have been a typo. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:19, 7 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:48, 28 July 2023
Please help ID
Please help ID pistol. --Ben41 (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
- Its an Inglis Hi-Power, an absolutely bizarre choice for a modern day Russian navy officer to be carrying, but whatever. --commando552 (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
- Also, what with the Hi-Power being SA only it is incapable of firing in that scene as the hammer isn't cocked. --commando552 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
It's an Inglis pattern Hi-power with tangent sights, which could mean a number of things. Least likely that it's Canadian, but this model was highly produced by the Chinese as well. --Gwhysow (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (EDT)
AKs
I do not think these are really AK-103s as they appear to have the old style of gas block rather than the AK-74 type one used on the AK-100s series. Rather, I think they are jusy AKMS dressed up as AK-74Ms by adding polymer furniture and a muzzle brake. Also, I can't remember what episode it was in, but there was one where some of the AKs were actually SA Vz.58s (think it might have been the one where they boarded the Russian ship to rescue the Captain but can't remember). There is actually a picture of one up on the main page already:
The guy on the right has an SA vz. 58P, but I seem to remember there were more than just this one in the episode. --commando552 (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2014 (EDT)
Additionally, you can clearly see in the pic of Chandler holding one that there's no hinge for the stock to fold, so yeah, these are just dressed up AKMs. Spartan198 (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2014 (EST)
2nd P226 image
The description for the 2nd P226 image says that he is holding a P228 and that it is likely a stand in for the real P226. Two things, one, if it was a P228, wouldn't we make a separate section stating that in a continuity error or something the character was using a 228 instead of a 226? Two, that is not a 228. Look at the barrel length and trigger guard, neither are right for a 228, but are quite correct looking for the 226. I can't quite tell if it has rails on the frame so it may not be the same as the others, but I'm pretty sure that it is definitely a 226.--One shot is all it takes. (talk) 12:54, 7 October 2017 (EDT)
- I concur given the slide length and the 'hooked' trigger guard this is a P226 and not a P228.. that said it definitely doesn't have the accessory rail and looks to have the older stamped slide making me think it's an earlier standard 226 standing in for the 'Navy' model, in which case the '228' could just have been a typo. StanTheMan (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2017 (EDT)