Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Journey to the End of the Night: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "How do you figure the MP5Ks are built out of Thompsons? They look like the Daisy airsoft MP5Ks. --~~~~")
 
(→‎M1911 variant: new section)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
How do you figure the MP5Ks are built out of Thompsons? They look like the Daisy airsoft MP5Ks. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 23:26, 30 May 2013 (EDT)
How do you figure the MP5Ks are built out of Thompsons? They look like the Daisy airsoft MP5Ks. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 23:26, 30 May 2013 (EDT)
:The rear sights have the shape of the M1A1 rear sights. -- [[User:Wicket1138|Wicket1138]] ([[User talk:Wicket1138|talk]]) 02:04, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
::But it can just as easily be this, can't it? Do they actually fire in the film? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 02:16, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
[[Image:Model15.jpeg|thumb|none|400px|Falcon replica]]
:They can't be M1A1s. M1A1s don't have curved mags. All you have is the rear sights, which I guarantee you is the lighting. But even if they were M1A1 sights, those are easily changeable. You can't really make a big gun like the M1A1 look like an MP5K. -protoAuthor 03:05, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
== Taurus Model 431 ==
I don't think the revolver you mention as a [[Taurus Model 431]], is a model 431. First of all, the images show a 6-shot revolver, and Model 431 is 5-shot. I agree with you it is probably a Taurus (the logo is visible...) but more likely a [[Taurus Model 66]] like below.
[[File:Taurus Model 66SS4.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 66 with 4" barrel and stainless steel finish - .357 Magnum.]]
Please check again and revise if you agree, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 15:56, 30 September 2013 (EDT)
== M1911 variant ==
I have an impression that the 'M1911 variant' is more likely a [[Taurus PT92]] variant. The only real give-away is the typical trigger guard, which is also seen on the [[Beretta 92FS]] but this being Brazil, I would put my bets on the Taurus. Also, what you can see from the slide looks more '92-ish'. Can you check again, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 16:02, 30 September 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:02, 30 September 2013

How do you figure the MP5Ks are built out of Thompsons? They look like the Daisy airsoft MP5Ks. --Funkychinaman (talk) 23:26, 30 May 2013 (EDT)

The rear sights have the shape of the M1A1 rear sights. -- Wicket1138 (talk) 02:04, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
But it can just as easily be this, can't it? Do they actually fire in the film? --Funkychinaman (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Falcon replica
They can't be M1A1s. M1A1s don't have curved mags. All you have is the rear sights, which I guarantee you is the lighting. But even if they were M1A1 sights, those are easily changeable. You can't really make a big gun like the M1A1 look like an MP5K. -protoAuthor 03:05, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

Taurus Model 431

I don't think the revolver you mention as a Taurus Model 431, is a model 431. First of all, the images show a 6-shot revolver, and Model 431 is 5-shot. I agree with you it is probably a Taurus (the logo is visible...) but more likely a Taurus Model 66 like below.

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Taurus Model 66 with 4" barrel and stainless steel finish - .357 Magnum.

Please check again and revise if you agree, PeeWee055 (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2013 (EDT)

M1911 variant

I have an impression that the 'M1911 variant' is more likely a Taurus PT92 variant. The only real give-away is the typical trigger guard, which is also seen on the Beretta 92FS but this being Brazil, I would put my bets on the Taurus. Also, what you can see from the slide looks more '92-ish'. Can you check again, PeeWee055 (talk) 16:02, 30 September 2013 (EDT)