| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Barrett M95: Difference between revisions
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==M82== | |||
Shouldnt this be on M82 page ? Its basically just bullpup, right ? | Shouldnt this be on M82 page ? Its basically just bullpup, right ? | ||
- It's magazine-fed, but bolt-action. The 82 series are semiautomatic rifles. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 14:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | - It's magazine-fed, but bolt-action. The 82 series are semiautomatic rifles. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 14:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Does anyone know if there is a name difference between the the original M95 with the M82 style scope rail, and the current one with the M107 style one? Below is the original M95, which appears in ''[[Hitman 2: Silent Assassin]]'' and ''[[Mercenaries 2: World in Flames]]'' (not 100% about the last one, model is kinda crappy). The one with the longer rail was developed for the M107 program so it had the same improvements that the M82 had to turn it into the M107, but as the improved M95 wasn't adopted it didn't get a new name. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 08:21, 30 May 2013 (EDT) | Does anyone know if there is a name difference between the the original M95 with the M82 style scope rail, and the current one with the M107 style one? Below is the original M95, which appears in ''[[Hitman 2: Silent Assassin]]'' and ''[[Mercenaries 2: World in Flames]]'' (not 100% about the last one, model is kinda crappy). The one with the longer rail was developed for the M107 program so it had the same improvements that the M82 had to turn it into the M107, but as the improved M95 wasn't adopted it didn't get a new name. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 08:21, 30 May 2013 (EDT) | ||
[[File:Barrett M95 original.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Barrett M95 - .50 BMG]] | [[File:Barrett M95 original.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Barrett M95 - .50 BMG]] | ||
That's the M90, the model that preceded the M95, the updates to the rail system was part of the production upgrade the ended production of the M90 and started with the M95. Hope it helps [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] ([[User talk:Recon42|talk]]) 13:11, 30 May 2013 (EDT) | |||
:No it isn't, however the original M90 and the M95 are very similar, the only differences are that the M95 moved the pistol grip and trigger slightly further forward to make inserting the magazine easier, and the bolt handle was swept backwards. Look at the image history of the later model railed M95 image and you will see a [http://www.imfdb.org/images/archive/9/9d/20100211165900!Barrett_m90.jpg picture of the M90] as the original image. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (EDT) | |||
== .416 Barrett M95? == | |||
Just something I've always wondered, Barrett themselves offer an M82 and M99 in .416 Barrett but I haven't seen a reference to an M95 version. Just curious if it would be at all feasible? [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] ([[User talk:Draco122|talk]]) 07:43, 16 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
It would seem likely that the M95 is chambered in .416 Barrett, however the offical Barrett website says only .50 BMG for calibers under the "Specs" tab of the rifle's page. --[[User:FPS FTW|talk]] ([[User talk:FPS FTW|talk]]) 22;48, 16 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
== Magazine Compatibility == | |||
Are the M95's 5-round magazines interchangeable with the M82 series' 10-rounders? It would make sense if they were, but I haven't seen any photos of either gun with the other's magazine. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 19:25, 29 March 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:26, 20 April 2020
M82
Shouldnt this be on M82 page ? Its basically just bullpup, right ?
- It's magazine-fed, but bolt-action. The 82 series are semiautomatic rifles. StanTheMan 14:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone know if there is a name difference between the the original M95 with the M82 style scope rail, and the current one with the M107 style one? Below is the original M95, which appears in Hitman 2: Silent Assassin and Mercenaries 2: World in Flames (not 100% about the last one, model is kinda crappy). The one with the longer rail was developed for the M107 program so it had the same improvements that the M82 had to turn it into the M107, but as the improved M95 wasn't adopted it didn't get a new name. --commando552 (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2013 (EDT)
That's the M90, the model that preceded the M95, the updates to the rail system was part of the production upgrade the ended production of the M90 and started with the M95. Hope it helps Recon42 (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2013 (EDT)
- No it isn't, however the original M90 and the M95 are very similar, the only differences are that the M95 moved the pistol grip and trigger slightly further forward to make inserting the magazine easier, and the bolt handle was swept backwards. Look at the image history of the later model railed M95 image and you will see a picture of the M90 as the original image. --commando552 (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (EDT)
.416 Barrett M95?
Just something I've always wondered, Barrett themselves offer an M82 and M99 in .416 Barrett but I haven't seen a reference to an M95 version. Just curious if it would be at all feasible? Draco122 (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2014 (EDT)
It would seem likely that the M95 is chambered in .416 Barrett, however the offical Barrett website says only .50 BMG for calibers under the "Specs" tab of the rifle's page. --talk (talk) 22;48, 16 August 2014 (EDT)
Magazine Compatibility
Are the M95's 5-round magazines interchangeable with the M82 series' 10-rounders? It would make sense if they were, but I haven't seen any photos of either gun with the other's magazine. Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2020 (EDT)