| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:End of Days: Difference between revisions
Gunmaster45 (talk | contribs) |
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:''Still doesn't really make much sense for that gun though, unless less-lethal rounds (like beanbags) are coming out of the tube.'' --[[User:Clutch|Clutch]] 00:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | :''Still doesn't really make much sense for that gun though, unless less-lethal rounds (like beanbags) are coming out of the tube.'' --[[User:Clutch|Clutch]] 00:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah, like I said, a close quarters submachine gun isn't supposed to be mated with a grenade launcher ment to combat vehicles and personel at 60+ yards. Except if it is firing less lethal rounds, smoke rounds, or anything that doesn't have the distance safety. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | :: Yeah, like I said, a close quarters submachine gun isn't supposed to be mated with a grenade launcher ment to combat vehicles and personel at 60+ yards. Except if it is firing less lethal rounds, smoke rounds, or anything that doesn't have the distance safety. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | ||
:::Actually, the original OICW concept was to marry an SMG (vice an assault rifle or carbine) with an airburst grenade launcher. Several mockups and computer models prior to what became the XM29 investigated using a weapon similar to a P90 to keep weight and bulk down while maintaining armor penetration capability. The idea was that the grenade launcher was the primary weapon, and the SMG fufilled a PDW role for when an enemy was too close to use grenades on. | |||
:::I honestly don't see a problem with the weapon. The grenade launcher extends the range of his MP5 and gives him an anti-vehicle capability while still keeping the bulk down enough to hide the composite weapon in his jacket. In the real world, people that use grenade launchers don't typically have the need to conceal their weapons, but Jericho did (at least for a time). An M4 wouldn't have served him in this regard, and an MP5 on its own would have lacked the firepower he needed. A niche weapon to be sure, but not a ludicrous concept. - [[User:Gau17|Gau17]] | |||
==SR9-TC== | |||
I'm not too sure about this ID. The "clubfoot" portion of the stock looks too short for it to be a PSG-1 stock. Could it be an MSG90 instead? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 12:29, 26 March 2019 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:29, 26 March 2019
You are completely correct about his Glock, and I am surprised. But here's what threw me off: PropStore.com had a rubber stunt version of Jericho's Glock for sale about a year or two back, and that one was clearly a Glock 17L (no rail, no finger grooves, wrong slide shape). I'm guessing you're right that Glock might have had a promotional deal - check the credits and you may be able to find out.
Also, PropStore now has the rubber stunt version of Jericho's MP5 for sale. -MT2008 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, the image will look better on the page then the airsoft prop. It doesn't have an SEF trigger group and many other feattures. The reason they had a Glock 17L as the rubber stunt prop was likely because the Glock 34 was so new, they had no rubber versions and probably found it easier to use wha they had instead of cast a new prop. Now that I know a rubber prop version was used, it makes me wish I hadn't removed some of the images I had. Might have to go back on that. - Gunmaster45
When did Robin Tunney get the lazy right eye? I noticed she doesn't have that in this movie but in Prison Break and The Mentalist (two off the top of my head), she has that one lazy eye. Anyone know something about that?
The DSA SA58 OSW.
It´s just a regular FN FAL with a 18" barrel and side-folding stock.Oliveira 11:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The M-203
There is a Real world example of the M-203 mounted under the MP-5. RM equipment makes a M-203PI that can be mounted under an MP-5. I think that's where they got the idea. http://m203pi.com/M203PI-Applications.htm Rockwolf66 23:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Still doesn't really make much sense for that gun though, unless less-lethal rounds (like beanbags) are coming out of the tube. --Clutch 00:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, like I said, a close quarters submachine gun isn't supposed to be mated with a grenade launcher ment to combat vehicles and personel at 60+ yards. Except if it is firing less lethal rounds, smoke rounds, or anything that doesn't have the distance safety. - Gunmaster45
- Actually, the original OICW concept was to marry an SMG (vice an assault rifle or carbine) with an airburst grenade launcher. Several mockups and computer models prior to what became the XM29 investigated using a weapon similar to a P90 to keep weight and bulk down while maintaining armor penetration capability. The idea was that the grenade launcher was the primary weapon, and the SMG fufilled a PDW role for when an enemy was too close to use grenades on.
- I honestly don't see a problem with the weapon. The grenade launcher extends the range of his MP5 and gives him an anti-vehicle capability while still keeping the bulk down enough to hide the composite weapon in his jacket. In the real world, people that use grenade launchers don't typically have the need to conceal their weapons, but Jericho did (at least for a time). An M4 wouldn't have served him in this regard, and an MP5 on its own would have lacked the firepower he needed. A niche weapon to be sure, but not a ludicrous concept. - Gau17
- Yeah, like I said, a close quarters submachine gun isn't supposed to be mated with a grenade launcher ment to combat vehicles and personel at 60+ yards. Except if it is firing less lethal rounds, smoke rounds, or anything that doesn't have the distance safety. - Gunmaster45
SR9-TC
I'm not too sure about this ID. The "clubfoot" portion of the stock looks too short for it to be a PSG-1 stock. Could it be an MSG90 instead? Spartan198 (talk) 12:29, 26 March 2019 (EDT)