| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Jagged Alliance: Back in Action: Difference between revisions
(Found indication about a G11 in JA:BA) |
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) m (→G11 ?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
For the rifle itself: You can see that this depicts a G11K2 with camo paint and no scope/carry handle and even without the mount base, it also has just one mag inserted and it is mirrored or it has the charging handle on the wrong side. The range it a bit low compared to the ranges it was successfully tested but I think it is rather high if consider firing it without any sights. Rof is to high for original full auto and to low for original burst. The mag size is from pre K2 versions. And one could think of that this is lacking the selector switch but I think that is more because of the rather bad picture quality. | For the rifle itself: You can see that this depicts a G11K2 with camo paint and no scope/carry handle and even without the mount base, it also has just one mag inserted and it is mirrored or it has the charging handle on the wrong side. The range it a bit low compared to the ranges it was successfully tested but I think it is rather high if consider firing it without any sights. Rof is to high for original full auto and to low for original burst. The mag size is from pre K2 versions. And one could think of that this is lacking the selector switch but I think that is more because of the rather bad picture quality. | ||
For the ammo: They show two different development stages of the the left one is a non telescopic round from the (I think , I haven't checked so far) late seventies you couldn't load them into a later G11 mag without damaging the round and couldn't chamber them also. The two on the right side are a version of the latest development stage of the G11 ammo but these are ex rounds. | For the ammo: They show two different development stages of the the left one is a non telescopic round from the (I think , I haven't checked so far) late seventies you couldn't load them into a later G11 mag without damaging the round and couldn't chamber them also. The two on the right side are a version of the latest development stage of the G11 ammo but these are ex rounds. | ||
[[File:Imfdb-jagged-BA-G11.jpg|200px|thumb| | [[File:Imfdb-jagged-BA-G11.jpg|200px|thumb|none|Camo G11K2 and ammo]] --[[User:DAN11|DAN11]] ([[User talk:DAN11|talk]]) 17:19, 25 February 2013 (EST) | ||
: Can someone who has the game confirm that this thing is actually in the official release? --[[User:DAN11|DAN11]] ([[User talk:DAN11|talk]]) 07:15, 1 March 2013 (EST) | |||
== HK53 == | |||
It looks to me more like the developers just took an MP5 and stretched out the magwell to fit a 5.56 mag, rather than a true HK53. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 19:27, 14 April 2015 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:27, 14 April 2015
Wow what the hell is this......I saw vids of this game on Youtube and it's a sequel IN NAME ONLY. --HashiriyaR32 19:45, 10 July 2011 (CDT)
- It's not a Sequel, it's a 3D Remake ;) --Masterius 02:11, 11 July 2011 (CDT)
The game has wrong gun name.
I don't know what's happen about the guns name right(trademark or something?) in video game industry, but every guns in JA:BIA had been messed-up with that. More than half of them have wrong or misspelling name.
about the Colt "M16"
Could it be Diemaco C7 from the previous title?
- No it isn't, it has the A1 style lower receiver and pistol grip, the C7 uses A2 parts. Also, remember to sign your posts by using the signature button. --commando552 (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
G11 ?
I don't have the game but I just saw a video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBhFPYAzTLw ) (couln't figure out how to post a link clean, sorry) where they showed a G11 in the game and stated that they have played without any mods. For the rifle itself: You can see that this depicts a G11K2 with camo paint and no scope/carry handle and even without the mount base, it also has just one mag inserted and it is mirrored or it has the charging handle on the wrong side. The range it a bit low compared to the ranges it was successfully tested but I think it is rather high if consider firing it without any sights. Rof is to high for original full auto and to low for original burst. The mag size is from pre K2 versions. And one could think of that this is lacking the selector switch but I think that is more because of the rather bad picture quality. For the ammo: They show two different development stages of the the left one is a non telescopic round from the (I think , I haven't checked so far) late seventies you couldn't load them into a later G11 mag without damaging the round and couldn't chamber them also. The two on the right side are a version of the latest development stage of the G11 ammo but these are ex rounds.
--DAN11 (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2013 (EST)
- Can someone who has the game confirm that this thing is actually in the official release? --DAN11 (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2013 (EST)
HK53
It looks to me more like the developers just took an MP5 and stretched out the magwell to fit a 5.56 mag, rather than a true HK53. Spartan198 (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2015 (EDT)