| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Call of Juarez: Gunslinger: Difference between revisions
Steelblade (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The unknown revolver looks to be a Dragoon. It's too large for a .36 navy, though it has the octogon barrel. The dragoons all had the round barrel, and none of the Colts had t...") |
Steelblade (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm interested in other's take on this. | I'm interested in other's take on this. | ||
== Unknown Revolver == | |||
Right now the most logical explanation is the unknown revolver is a Colt Navy 1851 custom made with a rear sight, and possibly chambered for a larger caliber. That or the angle just makes it look big. - [[User:1morey]] February 2, 2013 5:52 PM (EST) | |||
I don't think it's scaled up. One would have to scale up the barrel, cylinder, frame, etc. I may just look big as you said, the angle. Or the wielder is very small. - [[User:steelblade]] February 2, 2013 5:37 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:37, 2 February 2013
The unknown revolver looks to be a Dragoon. It's too large for a .36 navy, though it has the octogon barrel. The dragoons all had the round barrel, and none of the Colts had the extra sight at the back of the barrel though I always thought it would be better than using the hammer as they actually do. I think we can call this a slightly inaccurate Colt Dragoon.
I'm interested in other's take on this.
Unknown Revolver
Right now the most logical explanation is the unknown revolver is a Colt Navy 1851 custom made with a rear sight, and possibly chambered for a larger caliber. That or the angle just makes it look big. - User:1morey February 2, 2013 5:52 PM (EST)
I don't think it's scaled up. One would have to scale up the barrel, cylinder, frame, etc. I may just look big as you said, the angle. Or the wielder is very small. - User:steelblade February 2, 2013 5:37 (CST)