| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Alamo (2004): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Alamo, The (2004) to Talk:The Alamo (2004): Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I believe that that musket has been misidentified, it is a Brown Bess Musket not a Charleville. Note that it does not have the distinctive double throated hammer -Hawkeye | I believe that that musket has been misidentified, it is a Brown Bess Musket not a Charleville. Note that it does not have the distinctive double throated hammer -Hawkeye | ||
:The Baker rifle is wrong as well I think. It has no patch box, I can't see a rear sight and it appears to have a barrel band, so I think it is probably a Charleville model instead. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:18, 22 December 2013 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 28 July 2023
To read an article on the rifle built for Billy Bob Thornton check out GUNS magazine, January 2004. The article, by Bill Ball, is entitled The most famous rifle of Texas! Recreating Colonel Crockett's rifle at the battle of the Alamo. --Markethunter 21:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not seeing a barrel band on it. Is it possible that some models of the Charleville didn't have barrel bands? -Markethunter
I believe that that musket has been misidentified, it is a Brown Bess Musket not a Charleville. Note that it does not have the distinctive double throated hammer -Hawkeye
- The Baker rifle is wrong as well I think. It has no patch box, I can't see a rear sight and it appears to have a barrel band, so I think it is probably a Charleville model instead. --commando552 (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2013 (EST)