| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
User talk:Jeddostotle7: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jeddostotle7 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT) | Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT) | ||
:Yes, the reason I reverted it was the other half (you saying he couldn't do that when he could). But just to explain, you're both ''kind of'' right there. He's talking specifically about the never-adopted STANAG 4179 (which would have specifically standardised the M16 30-round magazine in NATO weapons), you're talking about the magazine standards which evolved out of that STANAG and instead standardised the dimensions of the M16 magwell in a lot of NATO weapons. ''Strictly'' I don't think there was ever a STANAG document regarding 5.56mm magwell dimensions, which is why the G36 and earlier FAMAS iterations aren't compatible with M16-style magazines even though Germany and France are part of NATO. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:07, 4 September 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:07, 4 September 2012
Alarm für Cobra 11
When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; please do not clutter pages with comments. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--PistolJunkie 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)
- Oh, sorry, I've just seen other people doing it, and I thought it was what we were supposed to do. Jeddostotle7 8:00, 19 February 2012 (PST)
Personal attack
Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. Evil Tim 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)
- Yes, the reason I reverted it was the other half (you saying he couldn't do that when he could). But just to explain, you're both kind of right there. He's talking specifically about the never-adopted STANAG 4179 (which would have specifically standardised the M16 30-round magazine in NATO weapons), you're talking about the magazine standards which evolved out of that STANAG and instead standardised the dimensions of the M16 magwell in a lot of NATO weapons. Strictly I don't think there was ever a STANAG document regarding 5.56mm magwell dimensions, which is why the G36 and earlier FAMAS iterations aren't compatible with M16-style magazines even though Germany and France are part of NATO. Evil Tim 02:07, 4 September 2012 (CDT)