| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Mk 153 SMAW: Difference between revisions
(Proposed name change) |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Additional Images== | |||
[[File:Collapsed SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Collapsed Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]] | |||
[[Image:SMAW Mod 2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Mk 153 Mod 2 SMAW launcher assembly without encased rocket - 83mm]] | |||
== Proposed name change == | == Proposed name change == | ||
| Line 4: | Line 9: | ||
I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here | I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here | ||
[[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT) | [[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT) | ||
== SMAW-D == | |||
Should this really even be on the same page? I don't think it has anything in common with the Mk 153 other than the name and using the same warhead. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 04:07, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | |||
:Well, the M141 was developed from the Mk 153, although yeah it is quite different from the Mk 153, especially that it is not reloadable like it and that it's mainly an anti-structure weapon. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 08:29, 19 February 2018 (EST) | |||
== Splitting B300? == | |||
The current hierarchy puts B300 under the SMAW even though it precedes the SMAW. Should we split it and add a link to the opening section? --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 00:06, 10 August 2018 (EDT) | |||
:IIRC the logic behind the reversed order on this page is that the B300 should be on here (because SMAW is derived from it) but since we only have one film which it appears in, the SMAW gets to go first. It does seem kind of strange putting the least common variant (both in movies and IRL) first. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 02:50, 10 August 2018 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:17, 2 November 2021
Additional Images
Proposed name change
My opinion is that this page should be renamed B-300 as it was the very original version made by the israelis. But the actual m153 SMAW should still be featured on this page in additional variants section beneath the b-300 (which i intend to move to the top of the page above m153 smaw) I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here EoghanG93 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT)
SMAW-D
Should this really even be on the same page? I don't think it has anything in common with the Mk 153 other than the name and using the same warhead. Evil Tim (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
- Well, the M141 was developed from the Mk 153, although yeah it is quite different from the Mk 153, especially that it is not reloadable like it and that it's mainly an anti-structure weapon. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2018 (EST)
Splitting B300?
The current hierarchy puts B300 under the SMAW even though it precedes the SMAW. Should we split it and add a link to the opening section? --Wuzh (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2018 (EDT)
- IIRC the logic behind the reversed order on this page is that the B300 should be on here (because SMAW is derived from it) but since we only have one film which it appears in, the SMAW gets to go first. It does seem kind of strange putting the least common variant (both in movies and IRL) first. Evil Tim (talk) 02:50, 10 August 2018 (EDT)