Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Heckler & Koch HK33: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) (HK33SG/1) |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | |||
[[File:Century Arms C93 pistol.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Century Arms C93 pistol - 5.56x45mm NATO]] | |||
=Discussion= | |||
== HK33SG/1 == | == HK33SG/1 == | ||
Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT) | Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT) | ||
:If you can find an instance where this weapon has appeared, feel free to make a section for it on the page. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 17:57, 14 April 2011 (CDT) | |||
::My point was that it probably has never appeared. However, neither has the G3SG/1 yet that has a section. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:18, 14 April 2011 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:22, 5 November 2022
Additional Images
Discussion
HK33SG/1
Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --commando552 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT)
- If you can find an instance where this weapon has appeared, feel free to make a section for it on the page. Orca1 9904 17:57, 14 April 2011 (CDT)
- My point was that it probably has never appeared. However, neither has the G3SG/1 yet that has a section. --commando552 18:18, 14 April 2011 (CDT)