| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Hills Have Eyes (2006): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Wuzh moved page Talk:Hills Have Eyes, The (2006) to Talk:The Hills Have Eyes (2006): Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Are you going to do the sequel? It only has M4s. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC) | Are you going to do the sequel? It only has M4s. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:There's also an M9 in the sequel --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 00:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:03, 29 July 2023
I am adopting this page
Yet another lame page will bite the dust. It was selected for nuking. I am working on and finishing this page. MoviePropMaster2008 10:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Saving another page from Nuking. You're a hero, MPM! haha -Winn
- hahahaha yes. And I hope that others will do the same. I'd rather see our lame pages 'saved' than a ton of new stupid pages for stuff that barely qualifies to be here. Also this page was a disaster. ALL of the guns were wrongly identified. But I assume that the members who made this previously have gotten better (I got better, can't believe how sucky I was at page building in the early days) and won't make those types of mistakes any more. :) Thanks, glad to hear it. MoviePropMaster2008 00:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Are you going to do the sequel? It only has M4s. Excalibur01 17:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- There's also an M9 in the sequel --AdAstra2009 00:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)