| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Lost Mission (2007): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PistolJunkie (talk | contribs) (New page: The internet truly is a wonderful thing. Type this sucker into IMDB, and you find that it bears a striking resemblance to another amateur film that popped up here. And if [http://www.imdb....) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The internet truly is a wonderful thing. Type this sucker into IMDB, and you find that it bears a striking resemblance to another amateur film that popped up here. And if [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1195488/usercomments the reviews] are to be believed, this was shot in someones back yard with airsoft guns and a camcorder.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 16:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC) | The internet truly is a wonderful thing. Type this sucker into IMDB, and you find that it bears a striking resemblance to another amateur film that popped up here. And if [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1195488/usercomments the reviews] are to be believed, this was shot in someones back yard with airsoft guns and a camcorder.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 16:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Argggghh. Unfortunately, this is NOT a short. It is a feature. It is listed on IMDB and had limited distribution. Sorry, no matter how bad it may have been, it fulfills IMFDB's standards as set forth in the rules. I'm willing to ban shorts based on quality. Banning FEATURE Length films due to quality opens up a whole can of worms when it comes to a completely subjective viewpoint (for some). [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Maybe we should add a Piece of S**t clause to the Rules and Regulations which states that a film can be omitted from IMFDB if it's production values bloowwww. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 17:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I second that. Fact is there are some really lame ass flicks out there in addition to some movies that, literally, have one firearm in it. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 21:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:33, 18 October 2010
The internet truly is a wonderful thing. Type this sucker into IMDB, and you find that it bears a striking resemblance to another amateur film that popped up here. And if the reviews are to be believed, this was shot in someones back yard with airsoft guns and a camcorder.--PistolJunkie 16:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Argggghh. Unfortunately, this is NOT a short. It is a feature. It is listed on IMDB and had limited distribution. Sorry, no matter how bad it may have been, it fulfills IMFDB's standards as set forth in the rules. I'm willing to ban shorts based on quality. Banning FEATURE Length films due to quality opens up a whole can of worms when it comes to a completely subjective viewpoint (for some). MoviePropMaster2008 16:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Maybe we should add a Piece of S**t clause to the Rules and Regulations which states that a film can be omitted from IMFDB if it's production values bloowwww. --AdAstra2009 17:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- I second that. Fact is there are some really lame ass flicks out there in addition to some movies that, literally, have one firearm in it. --Charon68 21:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)