| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Next Friday: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:No, it's not an Inox. Inox finishes are a dull stainless; this Beretta is too shiny. It's a regular 92F with an after-market nickel finish added by a gunsmith (possibly the same person who made the grips). -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 03:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | :No, it's not an Inox. Inox finishes are a dull stainless; this Beretta is too shiny. It's a regular 92F with an after-market nickel finish added by a gunsmith (possibly the same person who made the grips). -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 03:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::If you polish stainless you can get it that shiny. Just look at the 1911s and Desert Eagles that are stainless and shine like that. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | |||
::Even so, there would be a noticable quality difference between the frame and slide if you did it to an Inox. That looks too much to me like a nickel finish that was added later. | |||
:As for the Glock, too hard to tell if it's a G19 or a G17, but the actor may just have very big hands. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 03:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
::- Looking back on the picture (which I only glanced at before), I'd have to agree that it's probably nickel. The color tone is a bit off for a stainless gun (nickel guns, I've noticed, have a 'whiter' tone to their color, stainless guns tend to retain the slightly 'bluer' steel color, even if you polish them). Even in the case of the lighter-toned Inox, the color still doesn't look entirely right when you compare the two. <br><br>As for the Glock, I was figuring by barrel length, seems a bit short for a 17. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 17:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 24 August 2010
Custom Beretta & Glock
- Could the 'Custom Beretta' simply be an Inox with custom grips?
Also -
I think this might actually be a Glock 19, rather than a full-size 17. StanTheMan 22:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- No, it's not an Inox. Inox finishes are a dull stainless; this Beretta is too shiny. It's a regular 92F with an after-market nickel finish added by a gunsmith (possibly the same person who made the grips). -MT2008 03:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- If you polish stainless you can get it that shiny. Just look at the 1911s and Desert Eagles that are stainless and shine like that. - Gunmaster45
- Even so, there would be a noticable quality difference between the frame and slide if you did it to an Inox. That looks too much to me like a nickel finish that was added later.
- As for the Glock, too hard to tell if it's a G19 or a G17, but the actor may just have very big hands. -MT2008 03:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- - Looking back on the picture (which I only glanced at before), I'd have to agree that it's probably nickel. The color tone is a bit off for a stainless gun (nickel guns, I've noticed, have a 'whiter' tone to their color, stainless guns tend to retain the slightly 'bluer' steel color, even if you polish them). Even in the case of the lighter-toned Inox, the color still doesn't look entirely right when you compare the two.
As for the Glock, I was figuring by barrel length, seems a bit short for a 17. StanTheMan 17:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- - Looking back on the picture (which I only glanced at before), I'd have to agree that it's probably nickel. The color tone is a bit off for a stainless gun (nickel guns, I've noticed, have a 'whiter' tone to their color, stainless guns tend to retain the slightly 'bluer' steel color, even if you polish them). Even in the case of the lighter-toned Inox, the color still doesn't look entirely right when you compare the two.