| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Stiletto: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Crazycrankle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Revolver== | |||
I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | ||
:Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
::It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the Python, though the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question. | |||
::The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as is the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::The GP100 was my best guess at the time, but since you brought up the Smith & Wesson 686, I'm thinking that might actually be it. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | |||
==Glock== | |||
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | |||
::I've been comparing the screenshots you posted, and ones I have from season 1 of Castle (Stana carried a Glock 17 at that point), I'm going to call it a Glock 17. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 21:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Alright then, no problems here -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | |||
==Unkown pistol== | |||
It looks like a NAA Guardian...most like the 32naa which is a.32acp model.--[[User:Spades of Columbia|Spades of Columbia]] 18:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:01, 13 September 2010
Revolver
I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --funkychinaman 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -Anonymous
- Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --funkychinaman 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the Python, though the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question.
- The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as is the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --funkychinaman 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- The GP100 was my best guess at the time, but since you brought up the Smith & Wesson 686, I'm thinking that might actually be it. -Anonymous
- The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as is the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --funkychinaman 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Glock
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --Crazycrankle 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -Anonymous
- I've been comparing the screenshots you posted, and ones I have from season 1 of Castle (Stana carried a Glock 17 at that point), I'm going to call it a Glock 17. --Crazycrankle 21:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Alright then, no problems here -Anonymous
- I've been comparing the screenshots you posted, and ones I have from season 1 of Castle (Stana carried a Glock 17 at that point), I'm going to call it a Glock 17. --Crazycrankle 21:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Unkown pistol
It looks like a NAA Guardian...most like the 32naa which is a.32acp model.--Spades of Columbia 18:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)