| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Kel-Tec RFB: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | =Additional Images= | ||
[[File:KT RFB with scope and suppressor.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Kel-Tec RFB with riflescope and suppressor | [[File:KT RFB with scope and suppressor.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Kel-Tec RFB with riflescope and suppressor - 7.62x51mm NATO]] | ||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
==24-inch RFB== | ==24-inch RFB== | ||
What would be the etiquette on grabbing an image from the manufacturer's website for a version of a weapon we don't have an image for yet? I'm fairly certain the RFB Target in ''[[Battlefield 4]]'' isn't actually an RFB Target but the shorter 24-inch Sporter/Hunter/whatever it's called, but I don't want to do anything about it until we have a proper image for that version, and I don't want to break any rules trying to grab one. [[User:Kadorhal|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal|talk]]) 15:51, 23 May 2020 (EDT) | What would be the etiquette on grabbing an image from the manufacturer's website for a version of a weapon we don't have an image for yet? I'm fairly certain the RFB Target in ''[[Battlefield 4]]'' isn't actually an RFB Target but the shorter 24-inch Sporter/Hunter/whatever it's called, but I don't want to do anything about it until we have a proper image for that version, and I don't want to break any rules trying to grab one. [[User:Kadorhal|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal|talk]]) 15:51, 23 May 2020 (EDT) | ||
:It's called RFB Hunter on Kel-Tec's website. There's no issue with uploading images from manufacturers websites. Go ahead; [ | :It's called RFB Hunter on Kel-Tec's website. There's no issue with uploading images from manufacturers websites, as far as I'm aware. Go ahead; [https://web.archive.org/web/20200224091403if_/https://www.keltecweapons.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/RFB24-Right_DSC3074-1.jpg right side] or [https://web.archive.org/web/20200224091401if_/https://www.keltecweapons.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/RFB24-Left_DSC3078-1.jpg left side], as you wish. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 16:17, 23 May 2020 (EDT) | ||
::Cool, thanks. [[User:Kadorhal|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal|talk]]) 16:44, 23 May 2020 (EDT) | ::Cool, thanks. [[User:Kadorhal|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal|talk]]) 16:44, 23 May 2020 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:39, 28 September 2022
Additional Images
Discussion
24-inch RFB
What would be the etiquette on grabbing an image from the manufacturer's website for a version of a weapon we don't have an image for yet? I'm fairly certain the RFB Target in Battlefield 4 isn't actually an RFB Target but the shorter 24-inch Sporter/Hunter/whatever it's called, but I don't want to do anything about it until we have a proper image for that version, and I don't want to break any rules trying to grab one. Kadorhal (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2020 (EDT)
- It's called RFB Hunter on Kel-Tec's website. There's no issue with uploading images from manufacturers websites, as far as I'm aware. Go ahead; right side or left side, as you wish. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2020 (EDT)
