| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Triple Action Thunder: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==About the Proof-of-concept claim== About the claim that the Triple Action Thunder "...was more or less a proof-of-concept for Triple Action's patented shock absorbing system...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==About the Proof-of-concept claim== | ==About the Proof-of-concept claim== | ||
About the claim that the Triple Action Thunder "...was more or less a proof-of-concept for Triple Action's patented shock absorbing system...", I do not remember if I read that claim somewhere or if I came up with the claim myself. I don't feel confident about that claim anymore, but I also don't feel confident removing it. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 04:37, 15 September 2020 (EDT) | About the claim that the Triple Action Thunder "...was more or less a proof-of-concept for Triple Action's patented shock absorbing system...", I do not remember if I read that claim somewhere or if I came up with the claim myself. I don't feel confident about that claim anymore, but I also don't feel confident removing it. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 04:37, 15 September 2020 (EDT) | ||
:I mean, if Triple Action wasn't a gun company, and their main big-deal thing was their shock absorbing mechanism (which I can only assume it was, since they went and got a patent on it), the most logical explanation for this thing's existence is that they were showing off their shock-absorbing system - after all, why else would they have built it? [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (EDT) | |||
Hmm, I think the most suspect claim I made might be"Triple Action was not a firearms firm"; I had no idea what Triple Action actually made and so it is incorrect for me to assume anything here. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 05:05, 15 October 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:05, 15 October 2020
About the Proof-of-concept claim
About the claim that the Triple Action Thunder "...was more or less a proof-of-concept for Triple Action's patented shock absorbing system...", I do not remember if I read that claim somewhere or if I came up with the claim myself. I don't feel confident about that claim anymore, but I also don't feel confident removing it. --Wuzh (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2020 (EDT)
- I mean, if Triple Action wasn't a gun company, and their main big-deal thing was their shock absorbing mechanism (which I can only assume it was, since they went and got a patent on it), the most logical explanation for this thing's existence is that they were showing off their shock-absorbing system - after all, why else would they have built it? Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (EDT)
Hmm, I think the most suspect claim I made might be"Triple Action was not a firearms firm"; I had no idea what Triple Action actually made and so it is incorrect for me to assume anything here. --Wuzh (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2020 (EDT)