| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Ross Rifle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Variant: On main page) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[File:Rosssniper.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Ross Model 1910 Mk III .303 calibre rifle used as a sniper rifle on the Western Front by Private Alfred Hugh Dillon MM, Wellington Infantry Regiment.]] | [[File:Rosssniper.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Ross Model 1910 Mk III .303 calibre rifle used as a sniper rifle on the Western Front by Private Alfred Hugh Dillon MM, Wellington Infantry Regiment.]] | ||
[[Image:Ross10b.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Ross Mk.IIIB - .303 British]] | [[Image:Ross10b.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Ross Mk.IIIB - .303 British]] | ||
== Additional Information == | == Additional Information == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
==Weapon Description== | ==Weapon Description== | ||
Granted I enjoy the read but in terms of practicality and site aesthetic doesn't what seems to be more-or-less a complete history of the gun as a description appear to be very - in fact I'd say, overly - lengthy? Perhaps it could be condensed some with the rest or whole version of the info to be put here in the discussion page. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 01:58, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | Granted I enjoy the read but in terms of practicality and site aesthetic doesn't what seems to be more-or-less a complete history of the gun as a description appear to be very - in fact I'd say, overly - lengthy? Perhaps it could be condensed some with the rest or whole version of the info to be put here in the discussion page. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 01:58, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:I dunno, it's only really four main paragraphs and most of it is about things the weapon does (ie, should do, but probably won't, in a fictional depiction) and where you should reasonably expect to see one. Wouldn't say it's much different to the M60 page having three paragraphs at the top and then a little one for each variant. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 02:43, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | |||
::That a bit better? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 02:59, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 25 March 2023
Sporter Variants
Variant
Additional Information
A good place to start if you're interested in this fascinating Canadian rifle.--Jcordell (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2013 (EDT) http://www.rossrifle.com/gallery/index.php/
I've got a better source since that link is broken for me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uGYSQ_-FJU --50AEDeagle (talk) 12:46 PM, 19 March 2017 (EST)
Weapon Description
Granted I enjoy the read but in terms of practicality and site aesthetic doesn't what seems to be more-or-less a complete history of the gun as a description appear to be very - in fact I'd say, overly - lengthy? Perhaps it could be condensed some with the rest or whole version of the info to be put here in the discussion page. StanTheMan (talk) 01:58, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
- I dunno, it's only really four main paragraphs and most of it is about things the weapon does (ie, should do, but probably won't, in a fictional depiction) and where you should reasonably expect to see one. Wouldn't say it's much different to the M60 page having three paragraphs at the top and then a little one for each variant. Evil Tim (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2017 (EDT)