| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:36th Precinct: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Zastava M85== | ==Zastava M85== | ||
The carbine in the movie has a shorter handguard than the Zastava rifles. It's more likely to be an Arsenal AR-SF with a Krinkov flash hider and wood furniture, just like the one used in [[District B13]]. Opinions? --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 09:22, 21 August 2017 (EDT) | The carbine in the movie has a shorter handguard than the Zastava rifles. It's more likely to be an Arsenal AR-SF with a Krinkov flash hider and wood furniture, just like the one used in [[District B13]]. Opinions? --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 09:22, 21 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
:I'm not sure, but likely. Both films used the same armorers. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:29, 21 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
::Okay, I looked it again. Wouldn't it be easier to stick the magazine from the AR-SF in the M85 than swapping out the handguard and the flash hider on the M85? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 12:51, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
:::Um... wasn't the second part of your sentence intended to the AR-SF? And like I said, the weapon in the film clearly has the different and shorter handguard, there's no way this one could be set up on a Zastava. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 13:04, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
::::And yes, it does look like the same weapon from B13, but again, are we sure that's an AR-SF? If the three distinguishing features of an AR-SF are the magazine, the stock and the flash hider, and two of those three things have been swapped out and the third is interchangeable, then how do you know it's an AR-SF? Where did the information on the B13 page come from? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 13:50, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
:::::Looking in the B13 page history, a couple of users suggested the AR-SF, and MPM eventually put the info in 2009. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 13:59, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
::::::Well, if MPM signed off fine. If you make the change, just remember, there's already an entry for the AR-SF, so just combine the two rather than simply switching the ID. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 14:03, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
:::::::Yeah, by quickly going with the alphabetical order I previously missed the fact that there was already another AR-SF section. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
::::::::The AR-SF does have more distinguishing features than the magazine, handguard and muzzle device, just not unique ones but in this combination they are distinct. Primarilly, the combination of having a Krink length barrel, stamped underfolding stock and top cover, but milled receiver is pretty telling of it being an AR-SF. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 15:57, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:57, 24 August 2017
Unidentified This article currently has one or more unidentified weapons. |
Unknowns
Unknown revolver
Vrinks teases Titi Brasseur (Francis Renaud) about drunkenly leaving his service weapon in the bathroom after Eddy's party. Although Titi is later shown firing a Glock 17 during the botched ambush. I used to think this was an MR-73, but I'm just no sure anymore. --Funkychinaman (talk) 21:43, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Discussion
Custom AR
I'm not 100% on that the ID of the Custom AR. I'm not sure if it's just that, a custom job, or a commerial variant that I missed. --Funkychinaman 21:10, 9 June 2012 (CDT)
Zastava M85
The carbine in the movie has a shorter handguard than the Zastava rifles. It's more likely to be an Arsenal AR-SF with a Krinkov flash hider and wood furniture, just like the one used in District B13. Opinions? --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
- I'm not sure, but likely. Both films used the same armorers. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
- Okay, I looked it again. Wouldn't it be easier to stick the magazine from the AR-SF in the M85 than swapping out the handguard and the flash hider on the M85? --Funkychinaman (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Um... wasn't the second part of your sentence intended to the AR-SF? And like I said, the weapon in the film clearly has the different and shorter handguard, there's no way this one could be set up on a Zastava. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- And yes, it does look like the same weapon from B13, but again, are we sure that's an AR-SF? If the three distinguishing features of an AR-SF are the magazine, the stock and the flash hider, and two of those three things have been swapped out and the third is interchangeable, then how do you know it's an AR-SF? Where did the information on the B13 page come from? --Funkychinaman (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Looking in the B13 page history, a couple of users suggested the AR-SF, and MPM eventually put the info in 2009. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Well, if MPM signed off fine. If you make the change, just remember, there's already an entry for the AR-SF, so just combine the two rather than simply switching the ID. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Yeah, by quickly going with the alphabetical order I previously missed the fact that there was already another AR-SF section. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- The AR-SF does have more distinguishing features than the magazine, handguard and muzzle device, just not unique ones but in this combination they are distinct. Primarilly, the combination of having a Krink length barrel, stamped underfolding stock and top cover, but milled receiver is pretty telling of it being an AR-SF. --commando552 (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Yeah, by quickly going with the alphabetical order I previously missed the fact that there was already another AR-SF section. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Well, if MPM signed off fine. If you make the change, just remember, there's already an entry for the AR-SF, so just combine the two rather than simply switching the ID. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Looking in the B13 page history, a couple of users suggested the AR-SF, and MPM eventually put the info in 2009. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- And yes, it does look like the same weapon from B13, but again, are we sure that's an AR-SF? If the three distinguishing features of an AR-SF are the magazine, the stock and the flash hider, and two of those three things have been swapped out and the third is interchangeable, then how do you know it's an AR-SF? Where did the information on the B13 page come from? --Funkychinaman (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Um... wasn't the second part of your sentence intended to the AR-SF? And like I said, the weapon in the film clearly has the different and shorter handguard, there's no way this one could be set up on a Zastava. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2017 (EDT)
- Okay, I looked it again. Wouldn't it be easier to stick the magazine from the AR-SF in the M85 than swapping out the handguard and the flash hider on the M85? --Funkychinaman (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2017 (EDT)