| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Mine (2016): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) |
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I agree. I'll grant it does have the smooth receiver like a Zastava or Type 56, but it also certainly has the sights and forend of an AK as noted. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 14:52, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | : I agree. I'll grant it does have the smooth receiver like a Zastava or Type 56, but it also certainly has the sights and forend of an AK as noted. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 14:52, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
::Is there any reason that this rifle can't be an AK-47? It has the wide front sight block, no bayonet lug on the gas block, a perforated gas tube, a sling loop on the rear of the receiver and a smooth top cover. Granted we can't really see if it is a stamped or milled receiver, but all of these previous features are indicators of an AK-47. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:34, 12 May 2017 (EDT) | ::Is there any reason that this rifle can't be an AK-47? It has the wide front sight block, no bayonet lug on the gas block, a perforated gas tube, a sling loop on the rear of the receiver and a smooth top cover. Granted we can't really see if it is a stamped or milled receiver, but all of these previous features are indicators of an AK-47. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:34, 12 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::Argh, you are totally right! This was my first contribution to IMFDB after a 6-month pause so I guess I lost my edge :-), [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 10:35, 12 May 2017 (EDT) | |||
== AKM or VZ58? == | == AKM or VZ58? == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]] ([[User talk:Insertjjs|talk]]) 15:01, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | --[[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]] ([[User talk:Insertjjs|talk]]) 15:01, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
:The shape of the magazine seems to match 5.56 (or maybe 5.45) rather than 7.62. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:06, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | :The shape of the magazine seems to match 5.56 (or maybe 5.45) rather than 7.62. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:06, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
== TAC-338 == | |||
I'm pretty sure the rifle in those screenshots is the same Remington detailed in the section beneath it. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 03:48, 10 March 2019 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:48, 10 March 2019
Zastava M70B1
This is most probably not a Zastava M70B1 but more probably an AKM; (1) it lacks the typical Zastava grenade launcher sights and (2) it has 2 instead of 3 cooling vents, PeeWee055 (talk) 08:43, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
- I agree. I'll grant it does have the smooth receiver like a Zastava or Type 56, but it also certainly has the sights and forend of an AK as noted. StanTheMan (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
- Is there any reason that this rifle can't be an AK-47? It has the wide front sight block, no bayonet lug on the gas block, a perforated gas tube, a sling loop on the rear of the receiver and a smooth top cover. Granted we can't really see if it is a stamped or milled receiver, but all of these previous features are indicators of an AK-47. --commando552 (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2017 (EDT)
AKM or VZ58?
I think the AKM in scope view picture is a VZ58. the Front Sight Post looks like a VZ58 Front sight post not an AK front sight. http://www.imfdb.org/images/thumb/0/0c/Mine_402.jpg/600px-Mine_402.jpg
--Insertjjs (talk) 15:01, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
- The shape of the magazine seems to match 5.56 (or maybe 5.45) rather than 7.62. Greg-Z (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2017 (EDT)
TAC-338
I'm pretty sure the rifle in those screenshots is the same Remington detailed in the section beneath it. Spartan198 (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2019 (EDT)