| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Anaconda 3: Offspring: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Yes, it was my mistake about Beretta. OK, let's have more mayhem: I wonder if the unidentified SMG can be a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_Mitralier%C4%83_model_1996_RATMIL RATMIL Md 96]? [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:08, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ::Yes, it was my mistake about Beretta. OK, let's have more mayhem: I wonder if the unidentified SMG can be a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_Mitralier%C4%83_model_1996_RATMIL RATMIL Md 96]? [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:08, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::If it is a Ratmil it has been massively modified, as the front sight is the wrong shape, it doesn't have the handguard, the barrel is too short relative to the position of the front sight, and it has a totally different muzzle device (I am just basing this off of [[media:Anaconda 3 SMG 2 2.jpg|this]] cap by the way, can't really make anything out from the other one). --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ::::If it is a Ratmil it has been massively modified, as the front sight is the wrong shape, it doesn't have the handguard, the barrel is too short relative to the position of the front sight, and it has a totally different muzzle device (I am just basing this off of [[media:Anaconda 3 SMG 2 2.jpg|this]] cap by the way, can't really make anything out from the other one). --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::::Agree, my guess was wrong. Sorry. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 02:25, 26 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::One more guess: maybe an [[Arsenal Shipka]]? [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 03:27, 27 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::Don't think so, the muzzle is wrong, the Shipka has an open topped front sight whereas this has a rounded hood, and there is no sign of the distinctive Shipka charging handle. I'm wondering if they might just be crappy MP5 replicas if some sort. The front sight looks like an MP5, There looks like there is some evidence of a slot on the coking tube for the cocking handle (albeit filled in implying a cheap plastic replica), and on both guns you can just about make out the mounting points for the claw scope bracket (particularly the rear one which is more distinctive). The flash hider also looks like a rough facsimile of the detachable one that goes on the 3-lug muzzle, but with that weird out of place ribbing at the back. Are these guns ever shown actually firing? --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 04:14, 27 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::'Unknown Pistol 1' appears to be a SIG Sauer, possibly a 220. --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 19:44, 25 June 2015 (GMT) | :::'Unknown Pistol 1' appears to be a SIG Sauer, possibly a 220. --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 19:44, 25 June 2015 (GMT) | ||
The Unidentified Revolver has the looks of a [[Smith & Wesson Model 642]] -- [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | The Unidentified Revolver has the looks of a [[Smith & Wesson Model 642]] -- [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
: 'Unknown Pistol 1' appears closer to a [[SIG-Sauer P228]] - The SIG appears to have the round-angled, non-hooked trigger guard, shorter barrel/slide and frame bulge, all indicative of a P228. I concur about the revolver, it appears to be a S&W Model 642. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:36, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | : 'Unknown Pistol 1' appears closer to a [[SIG-Sauer P228]] - The SIG appears to have the round-angled, non-hooked trigger guard, shorter barrel/slide and frame bulge, all indicative of a P228. I concur about the revolver, it appears to be a S&W Model 642. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:36, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:: Also, the Mossberg doesn't appear to have the switch safety on the top receiver and seems like there is a safety button protruding from the front of the trigger in the second screencap, making me think this might be a [[Maverick Model 88]]. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:40, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | :: Also, the Mossberg doesn't appear to have the switch safety on the top receiver and seems like there is a safety button protruding from the front of the trigger in the second screencap, making me think this might be a [[Maverick Model 88]]. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:40, 25 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Walther PP == | |||
I think that the Walther PP is actually a Carpati MD , wich is the romainian version of the | |||
Walther PP. | |||
:I don't think so. The barrel seems a lot longer than a Carpati. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:27, 17 August 2015 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 17 August 2015
The pistol, indetified as Beretta 92FS, seems to have a frame-mounted safety, so it looks more like Taurus PT92. The submachine guns are not Uzi but its distant relative, Romanian Sadu ASALT-96. "MP5s" are also ASALTs. And as the movie was filmed in Romania, the AKs also may be of Romanian origin, like WASR. Greg-Z (talk) 10:52, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- The second cap of the Beretta definitely shows a slide-mounted safety. The first unknown pistol appears to be some sort of SIG-Sauer. And the second appears to be a Dracula md. 98. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:06, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- Yes, it was my mistake about Beretta. OK, let's have more mayhem: I wonder if the unidentified SMG can be a RATMIL Md 96? Greg-Z (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- If it is a Ratmil it has been massively modified, as the front sight is the wrong shape, it doesn't have the handguard, the barrel is too short relative to the position of the front sight, and it has a totally different muzzle device (I am just basing this off of this cap by the way, can't really make anything out from the other one). --commando552 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- Agree, my guess was wrong. Sorry. Greg-Z (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2015 (EDT)
- One more guess: maybe an Arsenal Shipka? Greg-Z (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2015 (EDT)
- Don't think so, the muzzle is wrong, the Shipka has an open topped front sight whereas this has a rounded hood, and there is no sign of the distinctive Shipka charging handle. I'm wondering if they might just be crappy MP5 replicas if some sort. The front sight looks like an MP5, There looks like there is some evidence of a slot on the coking tube for the cocking handle (albeit filled in implying a cheap plastic replica), and on both guns you can just about make out the mounting points for the claw scope bracket (particularly the rear one which is more distinctive). The flash hider also looks like a rough facsimile of the detachable one that goes on the 3-lug muzzle, but with that weird out of place ribbing at the back. Are these guns ever shown actually firing? --commando552 (talk) 04:14, 27 June 2015 (EDT)
- One more guess: maybe an Arsenal Shipka? Greg-Z (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2015 (EDT)
- Agree, my guess was wrong. Sorry. Greg-Z (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2015 (EDT)
- If it is a Ratmil it has been massively modified, as the front sight is the wrong shape, it doesn't have the handguard, the barrel is too short relative to the position of the front sight, and it has a totally different muzzle device (I am just basing this off of this cap by the way, can't really make anything out from the other one). --commando552 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- 'Unknown Pistol 1' appears to be a SIG Sauer, possibly a 220. --RedRobinAlpha (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2015 (GMT)
- Yes, it was my mistake about Beretta. OK, let's have more mayhem: I wonder if the unidentified SMG can be a RATMIL Md 96? Greg-Z (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
The Unidentified Revolver has the looks of a Smith & Wesson Model 642 -- PeeWee055 (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- 'Unknown Pistol 1' appears closer to a SIG-Sauer P228 - The SIG appears to have the round-angled, non-hooked trigger guard, shorter barrel/slide and frame bulge, all indicative of a P228. I concur about the revolver, it appears to be a S&W Model 642. StanTheMan (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
- Also, the Mossberg doesn't appear to have the switch safety on the top receiver and seems like there is a safety button protruding from the front of the trigger in the second screencap, making me think this might be a Maverick Model 88. StanTheMan (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2015 (EDT)
Walther PP
I think that the Walther PP is actually a Carpati MD , wich is the romainian version of the Walther PP.
- I don't think so. The barrel seems a lot longer than a Carpati. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:27, 17 August 2015 (EDT)