| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Warm Bodies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Gun IDs== | ==Gun IDs== | ||
[[File:WarmBodiesUnknownShotgun3.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Promotional Valentine card showing the shotgun.]] | |||
[[File:WarmBodies92FS&Glock17.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]] | [[File:WarmBodies92FS&Glock17.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]] | ||
Ok, to start off I don't think that the G17 is really a Glock. The front end is all wrong and the trigger guard is more round looking than square. I would think maybe a Sigma is being used instead. Second, the PT92 looks like it has a slide mounted safety which would make it a 92FS INOX if I am not mistaken. The safety is barely visible so I may be wrong though. Just my two cents on the matter.--[[User:1911isthebestgunever|One shot is all it takes.]] ([[User talk:1911isthebestgunever|talk]]) 12:34, 27 January 2013 (EST) | Ok, to start off I don't think that the G17 is really a Glock. The front end is all wrong and the trigger guard is more round looking than square. I would think maybe a Sigma is being used instead. Second, the PT92 looks like it has a slide mounted safety which would make it a 92FS INOX if I am not mistaken. The safety is barely visible so I may be wrong though. Just my two cents on the matter.--[[User:1911isthebestgunever|One shot is all it takes.]] ([[User talk:1911isthebestgunever|talk]]) 12:34, 27 January 2013 (EST) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
::Damn this was a god-awful movie. I was thinking about screencapping this, but anyone who survives to the end of this film should be awarded with a chocolate-chip cookie... --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] ([[User talk:Warejaws|talk]]) 15:37, 29 October 2013 (EDT) | ::Damn this was a god-awful movie. I was thinking about screencapping this, but anyone who survives to the end of this film should be awarded with a chocolate-chip cookie... --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] ([[User talk:Warejaws|talk]]) 15:37, 29 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
:::That's the trouble with creating a page just based on a trailer, what happens when the movie is terrible and no one wants to watch it? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 15:41, 29 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
::::I hear 'ya. Hopefully someone sees this film and likes it, and signs up for IMFDb just to finish this page. Well... one can always hope. --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] ([[User talk:Warejaws|talk]]) 15:43, 29 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
::::Eh, I liked it. It was something new and different in a genre that (as much as I still love it) some argue has been stagnating for a while now. But right now I only have it On-Demand and on my DVR, so if I should pick up the DVD at some point, I'll do it if it's still incomplete. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 08:45, 12 November 2013 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:01, 1 June 2015
Gun IDs
Ok, to start off I don't think that the G17 is really a Glock. The front end is all wrong and the trigger guard is more round looking than square. I would think maybe a Sigma is being used instead. Second, the PT92 looks like it has a slide mounted safety which would make it a 92FS INOX if I am not mistaken. The safety is barely visible so I may be wrong though. Just my two cents on the matter.--One shot is all it takes. (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- I made the ID as a Taurus BECAUSE I could see what I thought was a frame-mounted safety. I don't think the Glock is a Glock either, but I can't find a better match yet. --Funkychinaman (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- I'm gonna agree with ya, looks a little Taurus-y to me. -The Winchester (talk) 12:35, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- Just saw this, and it's certainly not a Glock. John Malkovich's character referred to it as a "Ruger SR", so it's probably an SR9, the 9mm version. Alex T Snow (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2013 (EST)
It is in fact a Ruger SR9 or SR9C.DeadpoolDeadcool (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2013 (EST)DeadpoolDeadcool
- Damn this was a god-awful movie. I was thinking about screencapping this, but anyone who survives to the end of this film should be awarded with a chocolate-chip cookie... --Warejaws (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2013 (EDT)
- That's the trouble with creating a page just based on a trailer, what happens when the movie is terrible and no one wants to watch it? --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2013 (EDT)
- Damn this was a god-awful movie. I was thinking about screencapping this, but anyone who survives to the end of this film should be awarded with a chocolate-chip cookie... --Warejaws (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2013 (EDT)
- Eh, I liked it. It was something new and different in a genre that (as much as I still love it) some argue has been stagnating for a while now. But right now I only have it On-Demand and on my DVR, so if I should pick up the DVD at some point, I'll do it if it's still incomplete. Spartan198 (talk) 08:45, 12 November 2013 (EST)