Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Awaara: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "That revolver is definitely a Webley of some sort. --~~~~") |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That revolver is definitely a Webley of some sort. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 13:35, 12 September 2014 (EDT) | That revolver is definitely a Webley of some sort. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 13:35, 12 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
:I guess [[Webley Revolvers#Webley .455 Mk II|Mk II]] or [[Webley Revolvers#Webley .455 Mk III|Mk III]]. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:54, 12 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
::Pretty sure it is actually a Mk I. Firstly, it has to be either a Mk I or a Mk II as there is no cylinder cam under the holster guide like there is on the Mk III onwards. Secondly, if you look at the top of the back of the grip you can see that it is slightly spurred, which is one of the distinguishing features of the Mk I:[[File:Webley mk1.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Webley Mk I - .455 Webley]]It looks like it also has the thinner hammer of the Mk I rather than the Mk II, but it is hard to tell for sure from this angle. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:34, 13 September 2014 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:34, 13 September 2014
That revolver is definitely a Webley of some sort. --Funkychinaman (talk) 13:35, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
- I guess Mk II or Mk III. Greg-Z (talk) 13:54, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
- Pretty sure it is actually a Mk I. Firstly, it has to be either a Mk I or a Mk II as there is no cylinder cam under the holster guide like there is on the Mk III onwards. Secondly, if you look at the top of the back of the grip you can see that it is slightly spurred, which is one of the distinguishing features of the Mk I:It looks like it also has the thinner hammer of the Mk I rather than the Mk II, but it is hard to tell for sure from this angle. --commando552 (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2014 (EDT)