| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Blue Tiger: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pandolfini (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The revolver is a [[Single Action Army]] variant. Maybe a [[Ruger Single Six]]? And the last two caps of the Beretta clearly show safeties/decockers on the slide. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 22:01, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | The revolver is a [[Single Action Army]] variant. Maybe a [[Ruger Single Six]]? And the last two caps of the Beretta clearly show safeties/decockers on the slide. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 22:01, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
::I wouldn't say Single Six unless there were other indicators that it was a .22LR revolver. It is definitely a Single Action Army, whether it's an Ubert, Cimarron, Colt, Ruger or whatever, is anyone's guess unless we get more and different pictures to help ID it. But it is definitely a Single Action Army with 4.75" barrel.[[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008|talk]]) 02:01, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ::I wouldn't say Single Six unless there were other indicators that it was a .22LR revolver. It is definitely a Single Action Army, whether it's an Ubert, Cimarron, Colt, Ruger or whatever, is anyone's guess unless we get more and different pictures to help ID it. But it is definitely a Single Action Army with 4.75" barrel.[[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008|talk]]) 02:01, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
:::Sorry, I meant the Vaqueros. The hammer doesn't have a firing pin on it, so it might use a transfer bar. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:36, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
==No Spoilers== | ==No Spoilers== | ||
Just a reminder, you're violating one of our rules at the bottom of the page. Just a friendly reminder. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008|talk]]) 02:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | Just a reminder, you're violating one of our rules at the bottom of the page. Just a friendly reminder. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008|talk]]) 02:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT) Sorry please, but I spoiler uses no! This has made the one from which I copied the pattern :)--[[User:Pandolfini|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini|talk]]) 03:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:36, 11 September 2012
The revolver is a Single Action Army variant. Maybe a Ruger Single Six? And the last two caps of the Beretta clearly show safeties/decockers on the slide. --Funkychinaman (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2012 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say Single Six unless there were other indicators that it was a .22LR revolver. It is definitely a Single Action Army, whether it's an Ubert, Cimarron, Colt, Ruger or whatever, is anyone's guess unless we get more and different pictures to help ID it. But it is definitely a Single Action Army with 4.75" barrel.MoviePropMaster2008 (talk) 02:01, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- Sorry, I meant the Vaqueros. The hammer doesn't have a firing pin on it, so it might use a transfer bar. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say Single Six unless there were other indicators that it was a .22LR revolver. It is definitely a Single Action Army, whether it's an Ubert, Cimarron, Colt, Ruger or whatever, is anyone's guess unless we get more and different pictures to help ID it. But it is definitely a Single Action Army with 4.75" barrel.MoviePropMaster2008 (talk) 02:01, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
No Spoilers
Just a reminder, you're violating one of our rules at the bottom of the page. Just a friendly reminder. MoviePropMaster2008 (talk) 02:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT) Sorry please, but I spoiler uses no! This has made the one from which I copied the pattern :)--Pandolfini (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT)