| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 640: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Zackmann08 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Zackmann08 (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 640 Centennial to Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 640: S&W No longer uses the "Centennial" title for this gun since their centennial was over 50 years ago.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Anyone know why "centennial" is included in the title of this page? --[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]] 11:01, 29 December 2011 (CST) | Anyone know why "centennial" is included in the title of this page? --[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]] 11:01, 29 December 2011 (CST) | ||
:Why not just one page for the whole Centennial line? The 642 page only has four entries. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 11:12, 29 December 2011 (CST) | :Why not just one page for the whole Centennial line? The 642 page only has four entries. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 11:12, 29 December 2011 (CST) | ||
::I think for the sake of keeping the same format it would better to have each model on its own page. (IMHO) | ::I think for the sake of keeping the same format it would better to have each model on its own page. (IMHO) --[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]] 12:07, 29 December 2011 (CST) | ||
:::Also, the 40 and 340 were in the centennial line as well so don't think they should all be combined. I would say get rid of the centennial from the title as S&W doesn't use it anymore (it was over 50 years ago after all). | |||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 8 January 2012
Anyone know why "centennial" is included in the title of this page? --Zackmann08 11:01, 29 December 2011 (CST)
- Why not just one page for the whole Centennial line? The 642 page only has four entries. --Funkychinaman 11:12, 29 December 2011 (CST)
- I think for the sake of keeping the same format it would better to have each model on its own page. (IMHO) --Zackmann08 12:07, 29 December 2011 (CST)
- Also, the 40 and 340 were in the centennial line as well so don't think they should all be combined. I would say get rid of the centennial from the title as S&W doesn't use it anymore (it was over 50 years ago after all).
- I think for the sake of keeping the same format it would better to have each model on its own page. (IMHO) --Zackmann08 12:07, 29 December 2011 (CST)