|
|
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==RE G36K==
| | #REDIRECT [[User_talk:Evil_Tim]] |
| The Dragon/SuperDragon has little to no resemblance to the G36K Chances are that it is a completely different weapon design with influences from the M16 (Ejection port, magazine, and carryhandle).
| |
| Also The Falcon 2 has much more resemblance to the Double Eagle then the AMT Hardballer, that "laserlock" sight is not part of the Hardballer system and is an addon. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 01:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Look at a picture of the Colt Double Eagle and the Falcon 2, they look exactly the same --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 02:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :just because it's scope is the length of the whole pistol does not mean it's a reference to Terminator --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 02:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :: [[Image:Falcon 2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Falcon 2]] now compare the grip to this and the how the frame where the trigger guard is gradually rises until the end of the slide http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg169-e.htm --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 02:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Re: KF7 Soviet ==
| |
| | |
| If you look at the front sight of the KF7, it looks more like the hooded front sight of the Norinco-series AK's, a main distinguishing feature of that weapon. As for the M16, the M16A3 is the full-auto version of the M16A2, with the A2 firing only 3-shot bursts. For the RPG, the Type 69 has only a single pistol grip (whereas the RPG-7 has two). As for the 'giant grey cylinder' look, I can't say anything except for creative licensing on the part of the game designers. Hope this explains the logic behind my calls on that page. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 06:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Perfect Dark==
| |
| Just to inform you, the reason Perfect dark was deleated was the fact that the page wasn't very good and the consensus on the forum was to remove the page until such time as someone could create a proper page for the game. Although the priority on Perfect dark is very low due to members having much more popular pages to work on. [[User:Rockwolf66|Rockwolf66]] 07:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Einhander==
| |
| I would err on the side of caution. I would probably NOT delete the page if there is ONE verified real gun on it. We can't seem like hypocrites. There are movie pages on IMFDB which have only ONE gun on them, but they're still there. As long as the page look decent I wouldn't worry about that particular one.
| |
| | |
| RE: fantasy weapons in general ....... The author of Einhander, should, realize though that IMFDB strives to identify REAL GUNS, not fake guns. I had a list of the criteria of fake guns that we accept (a) it must be something based in real life (b) It must be realistic enough to confuse the general public who might 'wonder' of it is based on a real gun (c) It must be a fantasy weapon with a real gun inside (movies/tv only) or (d) there must be something about the weapon which will make the public think it's real or possibly real. That is why we have an entry for ERASER's rail gun. Too many idiots in the general public kept on asking us "Is that for real?" But something like a Star Trek phaser is off limits. No one in their right mind would think that's real or based on a real weapon. Hope this helps. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 19:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Keep Cool==
| |
| Now play nice the both of you or it could be bad. Just letting you know. -[[User:Phoenixent|Phoenixent]]
| |
| | |
| == No Halo real guns ==
| |
| | |
| I see the resemble, but the ammo magazine is in the wrong place compared to the Halo Sniper rifle. I can see how you can tell it's the same [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 08:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| == Guns ==
| |
| | |
| Try not to mention artillery, I believe there is a difference between firearms and cannons and RPGs, but people just love to point them out. For fictional guns, obviously a gun in a game that fires ICE isn't a firearm at all. People here really hate it when people even put down weapons that don't exist. I mean if you see a gun and it looks like a customized verison of a real gun or a slightly dressed up, it's fine, but no alien blasters or laser guns. I mean if you watched a movie and they are using real guns to "fire" laser beams, then it's ok since the prop itself is a real gun. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 08:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == :P ==
| |
| Nobody has touched my TWINE edit, guess I'm not as wrong as you think.
| |
| | |
| And why on earth do you think the Goldeneye sniper is an L96 or any other bolt action rifle?
| |
| | |
| [[User:PersonOfInterest]]
| |
| | |
| Yeah I second that --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 03:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Why is it so hard for you to accept that it's just not based on any real gun. Do you have some sort of OCD? [[PersonOfInterest]]
| |
| | |
| ==TOC==
| |
| Hey, Check out one the pages I did [[A Slight Case of Murder]] and let me know how it looks and if it's incorrect let me know. Thanks - [[User:Phoenixent|Phoenixent]]
| |
| | |
| I like that it's looks great. Thanks for you help. - [[User:Phoenixent|Phoenixent]]
| |