| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Hound of the Baskervilles, The (1959) to Talk:The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959): Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 17:15, 11 July 2023
Special Thanks
The idea and screenshots are provided by AVSniff, forum.guns.ru.--Greg-Z (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2019 (EST)
Unidentified revolver
This might be a Colt New Service such as this:
LJ (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- No. --Slon95 (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- It has an Adams patent ejector and the size looks proper for a .32/.38 revolver so one of the Webley .32/.38 pocket models would almost certainly match up lookswise with the revolver we see. A Webley Model 83 with a four inch barrel could be the gun. https://www.gunsamerica.com/userimages/144505/997021864/wm_4021548.jpg This will take you to an image of a Model 83 to look over and see if you agree on the possibility of it being a match. Black Irish Paddy (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- I found this article regarding a Webley No. 5 variant with small frame and round barrel https://www.thebroadarrow.info/webley-no5-360cf-revolverLJ (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2022 (EDT)
- After comparison I am tending towards the 4.5" Webley No. 5, unless some additional discussion occurs (hopefully more than a monosyllable).LJ (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2022 (EDT)
- I strongly doubt in it. The second revolver lacks the trigger guard, so it most likely has a folding trigger that never was used on Webley No 5. My best guess is that this is a Belgian pocket version of Webley RIC/Bulldog, chambered in calibers about .38 or .32. Such revolvers are not uncommon in British productions of 1950s-1970s.--Greg-Z (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2022 (EDT)
- After comparison I am tending towards the 4.5" Webley No. 5, unless some additional discussion occurs (hopefully more than a monosyllable).LJ (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2022 (EDT)