| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Ruger SP101: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Discussion) |
Doctor Luika (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | =Additional Images= | ||
[[Image:SOGRugerSP101.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger | [[File:Ruger SP101 22LR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger SP101 - .22 LR]] | ||
[[Image:SOGRugerSP101.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger SP101 Stainless - .357 Magnum.]] | |||
[[File:RugerSP101 right side view.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger SP 101 Stainless with hammer - .357 Magnum.]] | |||
[[Image:Ruger SP101 black.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger SP101 Black Cerakote - .357 Magnum]] | |||
[[File:Ruger SP101 with Wooden Grips.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Ruger SP101 with Wood Combat Grip - .357 Magnum.]] | |||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
I edited the picture so the SP101 was the only thing in it. I got rid of the other version of the picture. -GM | I edited the picture so the SP101 was the only thing in it. I got rid of the other version of the picture. -GM | ||
== SP101 vs. GP101 == | |||
Could somebody explain what's the difference between the models GP101 (seen above) and SP101 (seen previous page)? I think it's the outside coating but I am not 100% sure, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 03:05, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
:Could be wrong, but I am pretty sure it is just a misprint in this case. I have never heard of the SP101, and to me the supposed GP101 above just looks like a 3" barrelled SP101. As for the apparently different finishes, it may just be a lighting issue but it could also be that the SP101 above has Ruger's "Target Grey" finish. This isn't a coating but rather I think that the stainless stell is bead blasted and then acid etched to give it a duller grey finish. This is still an SP101 though, it is just a different model (I believe distributor exclusive from Lipsey's). --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 04:59, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
::Thanks for your response, I guess it's indeed a typo. Two reasons: (1) the above file is actually called SP101 (...) and (2) Google does not give any workable clues as to a revolver called GP101. I revised my entry back to SP101 as well as description line for above image. Take care, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 05:18, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
:::A few years ago, people were referring to the stainless GP100 as a GP101, which was incorrect. There's no such thing as a GP101. There's the GP100 and the SP101. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 06:29, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
:::: Lol, I never noticed it said 'GP101' before.. bah! Anyway, yeah that's a just a typo AFAIK. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 13:30, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 18 June 2023
Additional Images
Discussion
I edited the picture so the SP101 was the only thing in it. I got rid of the other version of the picture. -GM
SP101 vs. GP101
Could somebody explain what's the difference between the models GP101 (seen above) and SP101 (seen previous page)? I think it's the outside coating but I am not 100% sure, PeeWee055 (talk) 03:05, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Could be wrong, but I am pretty sure it is just a misprint in this case. I have never heard of the SP101, and to me the supposed GP101 above just looks like a 3" barrelled SP101. As for the apparently different finishes, it may just be a lighting issue but it could also be that the SP101 above has Ruger's "Target Grey" finish. This isn't a coating but rather I think that the stainless stell is bead blasted and then acid etched to give it a duller grey finish. This is still an SP101 though, it is just a different model (I believe distributor exclusive from Lipsey's). --commando552 (talk) 04:59, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Thanks for your response, I guess it's indeed a typo. Two reasons: (1) the above file is actually called SP101 (...) and (2) Google does not give any workable clues as to a revolver called GP101. I revised my entry back to SP101 as well as description line for above image. Take care, PeeWee055 (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- A few years ago, people were referring to the stainless GP100 as a GP101, which was incorrect. There's no such thing as a GP101. There's the GP100 and the SP101. --Funkychinaman (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Lol, I never noticed it said 'GP101' before.. bah! Anyway, yeah that's a just a typo AFAIK. StanTheMan (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- A few years ago, people were referring to the stainless GP100 as a GP101, which was incorrect. There's no such thing as a GP101. There's the GP100 and the SP101. --Funkychinaman (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Thanks for your response, I guess it's indeed a typo. Two reasons: (1) the above file is actually called SP101 (...) and (2) Google does not give any workable clues as to a revolver called GP101. I revised my entry back to SP101 as well as description line for above image. Take care, PeeWee055 (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2015 (EST)