Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:MAS-44: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Additional Images: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | == Merge with MAS-49 page == | ||
[[ | Shouldn't this page be merged with the [[MAS-49]] article as they are all developments on the same pattern of rifle?--[[User:AgentGumby|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby|talk]]) 13:46, 14 April 2020 (EDT) | ||
:On another note, I wonder if anyone can confirm whether 38/39 was capable (or not) to full-auto fire. This has a curious switch on the right side, not available in next versions. There are scans of the French article on the network: [http://fr.1001mags.com/parution/gazette-des-armes/numero-60-mai-1978/page-34-35-texte-integral], but there’s a whole shaft of information that not so easy to make out. As far as I can tell, there was a whole family of different prototypes, which were submitted both from fixed magazines and from removable ones. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 16:45, 14 April 2020 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:45, 28 February 2023
Merge with MAS-49 page
Shouldn't this page be merged with the MAS-49 article as they are all developments on the same pattern of rifle?--AgentGumby (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2020 (EDT)
- On another note, I wonder if anyone can confirm whether 38/39 was capable (or not) to full-auto fire. This has a curious switch on the right side, not available in next versions. There are scans of the French article on the network: [1], but there’s a whole shaft of information that not so easy to make out. As far as I can tell, there was a whole family of different prototypes, which were submitted both from fixed magazines and from removable ones. --Slon95 (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2020 (EDT)