| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Mannlicher Model 1905: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is worth noting that the available information is somewhat confusing. The M1905 was actually the M1901 designation for the Argentine army, so the Model 1901 would be a more correct name, it seems to me. Therefore, some sources refer to it as M1901/1905. The information of produce is also somewhat contradictory: about 10,000 were ordered for the Argentine army, while the M1901 was declared in 4,000 guns produced (i.e. at least 14,000 - 15,000 o' M1901/1905 were all produced). --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 08:27, 10 August 2019 (EDT) | It is worth noting that the available information is somewhat confusing. The M1905 was actually the M1901 designation for the Argentine army, so the Model 1901 would be a more correct name, it seems to me. Therefore, some sources refer to it as M1901/1905. The information of produce is also somewhat contradictory: about 10,000 were ordered for the Argentine army, while the M1901 was declared in 4,000 guns produced (i.e. at least 14,000 - 15,000 o' M1901/1905 were all produced). --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 08:27, 10 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
:Really? I mean, I get the suggestion to change the page's name, but I thought that the M1901 was the original, smaller version, and the M1905 was the larger variant (the one with the distinctive "bulge" towards the base of the grip); IIRC, the M1905 also held 10 rounds instead of 8 like the page claims. There's a C&Rsenal video about this, so I can check if need be. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 08:46, 10 August 2019 (EDT) | :Really? I mean, I get the suggestion to change the page's name, but I thought that the M1901 was the original, smaller version, and the M1905 was the larger variant (the one with the distinctive "bulge" towards the base of the grip); IIRC, the M1905 also held 10 rounds instead of 8 like the page claims. There's a C&Rsenal video about this, so I can check if need be. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 08:46, 10 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
::It seems that they were presented in compact and full-sized versions; 8 rounds, therefore, is the capacity of the compact variant. '''P.S.''' Yes, according to the Forgotten Weapons, the M1901 was a small version. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) | ::It seems that they were presented in compact and full-sized versions; 8 rounds, therefore, is the capacity of the compact variant. '''P.S.''' Yes, according to the Forgotten Weapons, the M1901 was a small version. '''P.S. 2''' Information about the quantity produced is still different and contradictory. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 12:31, 10 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:31, 10 August 2019
It is worth noting that the available information is somewhat confusing. The M1905 was actually the M1901 designation for the Argentine army, so the Model 1901 would be a more correct name, it seems to me. Therefore, some sources refer to it as M1901/1905. The information of produce is also somewhat contradictory: about 10,000 were ordered for the Argentine army, while the M1901 was declared in 4,000 guns produced (i.e. at least 14,000 - 15,000 o' M1901/1905 were all produced). --Slon95 (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2019 (EDT)
- Really? I mean, I get the suggestion to change the page's name, but I thought that the M1901 was the original, smaller version, and the M1905 was the larger variant (the one with the distinctive "bulge" towards the base of the grip); IIRC, the M1905 also held 10 rounds instead of 8 like the page claims. There's a C&Rsenal video about this, so I can check if need be. Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 08:46, 10 August 2019 (EDT)
- It seems that they were presented in compact and full-sized versions; 8 rounds, therefore, is the capacity of the compact variant. P.S. Yes, according to the Forgotten Weapons, the M1901 was a small version. P.S. 2 Information about the quantity produced is still different and contradictory. --Slon95 (talk) 12:31, 10 August 2019 (EDT)