Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Izhmekh Single Barreled Shotgun Series: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The only visible differ between the IZh-17 and IZh-18 is the exposed hammer of 17's model. It's ofter are not seen clear, that made ID is impossible. So, maybe it's should to merge IZh-17 and IZh-18 section and move the gun page to something like Izhmekh IZh-18/IZh-17 (or someting like that). If the hammer (or it's lack) is seen, the correct model may be depicted in '''Note''' section. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 08:03, 18 March 2017 (EDT) | The only visible differ between the IZh-17 and IZh-18 is the exposed hammer of 17's model. It's ofter are not seen clear, that made ID is impossible. So, maybe it's should to merge IZh-17 and IZh-18 section and move the gun page to something like Izhmekh IZh-18/IZh-17 (or someting like that). If the hammer (or it's lack) is seen, the correct model may be depicted in '''Note''' section. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 08:03, 18 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
:These are close relatives but still different guns, so separate entries for each are more correct. If some movie shotgun lacks distinctive features of IZh-17 or -18, then it must be put in the category for generic Single Barreled Shotguns. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 10:58, 18 March 2017 (EDT) | :These are close relatives but still different guns, so separate entries for each are more correct. If some movie shotgun lacks distinctive features of IZh-17 or -18, then it must be put in the category for generic Single Barreled Shotguns. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 10:58, 18 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
I also think you should merged all pump-action IZh shotguns on one page, as they are extremely close. We already have analogous with [[Mossberg 500 series shotgun|Mossberg 500]]. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 11:36, 1 April 2019 (EDT) | |||
:If nothing contradicts this, I can proceed to this. In addition, it would be better to merge the MP-153 and MP-155K pages. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 17:23, 1 April 2019 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 21:23, 1 April 2019
Additional Images
Subpage merging
The only visible differ between the IZh-17 and IZh-18 is the exposed hammer of 17's model. It's ofter are not seen clear, that made ID is impossible. So, maybe it's should to merge IZh-17 and IZh-18 section and move the gun page to something like Izhmekh IZh-18/IZh-17 (or someting like that). If the hammer (or it's lack) is seen, the correct model may be depicted in Note section. Pyramid Silent (talk) 08:03, 18 March 2017 (EDT)
- These are close relatives but still different guns, so separate entries for each are more correct. If some movie shotgun lacks distinctive features of IZh-17 or -18, then it must be put in the category for generic Single Barreled Shotguns. Greg-Z (talk) 10:58, 18 March 2017 (EDT)
I also think you should merged all pump-action IZh shotguns on one page, as they are extremely close. We already have analogous with Mossberg 500. --Slon95 (talk) 11:36, 1 April 2019 (EDT)