| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Beretta: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Additional Images== thumb|none|350px|Beretta Model 1923 - 9x19mm Glisenti") |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Additional Images== | ==Additional Images== | ||
[[ | |||
== Beretta/Browning hybrid? == | |||
Came across [http://www.deactivated-guns.co.uk/detail/PB.htm this image] online. Looks like a Beretta slide on a browning HP frame. Anyone got any info on this? --[[User:Slemke1998|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998|talk]]) 14:14, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
:A work of art from "Paul" Beretta! But seriously, WTF? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 14:20, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
:: It seems like a lot of British deactivated gun sellers are a bit clueless. I previously made another similar post involving a different seller who was advertising a deactivated "G3" which was actually a CETME--[[User:Slemke1998|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998|talk]]) 14:36, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
== Question == | |||
How can tell the difference of name between 92 and 90Two if I heard it in English? In Italian makes sense but in English? --[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 05:18, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
:: There really is no way to discern the two in spoken English but that said there hasn't been a Beretta '92' model in ages, they've long been superseded by the F/FS and other letter variants, in which case if you use the full proper model name, that will distinguish it. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:08, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
:Also another question, why is the "Auto 9" listed as a 93R variant in this page? Isn't that a movie/video game thing only? --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 08:22, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
Was an actual prop.--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 13:21, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
:: I think it's listed for the sake of being inclusive, though I agree I'm not sure even then it should be so as it could give the impression it is some factory variant rather than a specifically-built movie prop. I'd like an admin or two to weigh in on it first but I'd have to say maybe it oughta be taken down. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:08, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
Or we should say that is not a factory variant. Which is the most pratical choice.--[[User:Dannyguns|Dannyguns]] ([[User talk:Dannyguns|talk]]) 05:37, 29 January 2017 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:37, 29 January 2017
Additional Images
Beretta/Browning hybrid?
Came across this image online. Looks like a Beretta slide on a browning HP frame. Anyone got any info on this? --Slemke1998 (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
- A work of art from "Paul" Beretta! But seriously, WTF? --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
- It seems like a lot of British deactivated gun sellers are a bit clueless. I previously made another similar post involving a different seller who was advertising a deactivated "G3" which was actually a CETME--Slemke1998 (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
Question
How can tell the difference of name between 92 and 90Two if I heard it in English? In Italian makes sense but in English? --Dannyguns (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2017 (EST)
- There really is no way to discern the two in spoken English but that said there hasn't been a Beretta '92' model in ages, they've long been superseded by the F/FS and other letter variants, in which case if you use the full proper model name, that will distinguish it. StanTheMan (talk) 15:08, 28 January 2017 (EST)
- Also another question, why is the "Auto 9" listed as a 93R variant in this page? Isn't that a movie/video game thing only? --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 08:22, 28 January 2017 (EST)
Was an actual prop.--Dannyguns (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2017 (EST)
- I think it's listed for the sake of being inclusive, though I agree I'm not sure even then it should be so as it could give the impression it is some factory variant rather than a specifically-built movie prop. I'd like an admin or two to weigh in on it first but I'd have to say maybe it oughta be taken down. StanTheMan (talk) 15:08, 28 January 2017 (EST)
Or we should say that is not a factory variant. Which is the most pratical choice.--Dannyguns (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2017 (EST)