User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside - Revision history

SmithandWesson36: /* Cosh */

2012-10-30T23:39:52Z

Cosh

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 30 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)		Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

	~~== Cosh ==~~

	The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

	== Cosh ==		== Cosh ==

	The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)		The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

SmithandWesson36: /* Cosh */

2012-10-30T23:39:36Z

Cosh

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 30 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)		Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

	~~== Cosh ==~~

	The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

	== Cosh ==		== Cosh ==

SmithandWesson36: /* Cosh */ new section

2012-10-30T23:38:10Z

Cosh: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 30 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)		Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Cosh ==

			The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

	== Cosh ==		== Cosh ==

SmithandWesson36: /* Cosh */ new section

2012-10-30T23:38:01Z

Cosh: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 30 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)		Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Cosh ==

			The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

	== Cosh ==		== Cosh ==

	The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)		The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

SmithandWesson36: /* Cosh */ new section

2012-10-30T23:38:00Z

Cosh: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 30 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)		Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Cosh ==

			The non-firearm rule applies only to extensively used or iconic weapons, such as the hunting knife from [[Rambo: First Blood]]. I don't think that something that ''may'' be a pipe is acceptable under this rule. --[[User:SmithandWesson36\|SmithandWesson36]] ([[User talk:SmithandWesson36\|talk]]) 19:38, 30 October 2012 (EDT)

Funkychinaman: /* Uploads */ new section

2012-10-25T01:13:41Z

Uploads: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 25 October 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Your forum account has been created with username "REPLICAwrittendowntheside" and password "password". Please log in and change your password ASAP. Let me know if you have any questions by posting on MY discussion page. --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] ([[User talk:Zackmann08\|talk]]) 21:54, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		Your forum account has been created with username "REPLICAwrittendowntheside" and password "password". Please log in and change your password ASAP. Let me know if you have any questions by posting on MY discussion page. --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] ([[User talk:Zackmann08\|talk]]) 21:54, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Uploads ==

			Please tag your screenshots with <nowiki>[[Category: Screenshot]]</nowiki> and any posters/covers with <nowiki>[[Category: Poster and Cover Art]]</nowiki>. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2012 (EDT)

Zackmann08: /* Forum Account */ new section

2012-10-22T01:54:36Z

Forum Account: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 22 October 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	::::::Well, there are only so many "popular" movies out there. I've done my share of "obscure" movies, believe me. But who knows, maybe someone will see this page and be motivated to see ''Hennessy''. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::::::Well, there are only so many "popular" movies out there. I've done my share of "obscure" movies, believe me. But who knows, maybe someone will see this page and be motivated to see ''Hennessy''. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Forum Account ==

			Your forum account has been created with username "REPLICAwrittendowntheside" and password "password". Please log in and change your password ASAP. Let me know if you have any questions by posting on MY discussion page. --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] ([[User talk:Zackmann08\|talk]]) 21:54, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 18:18, 21 October 2012

2012-10-21T18:18:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 21 October 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			::::::Well, there are only so many "popular" movies out there. I've done my share of "obscure" movies, believe me. But who knows, maybe someone will see this page and be motivated to see ''Hennessy''. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

REPLICAwrittendowntheside: /* Hennessy */ reply

2012-10-21T18:02:30Z

Hennessy: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 21 October 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 18:00, 21 October 2012

2012-10-21T18:00:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 21 October 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::If you're unsure about an ID, you can always put them on the talk page and ask for help. As for the M2, I think there are very few real M2s out there, so it's probably safer to assume that they're M1s. (Per the M1 Carbine page: "''There must be a visible selector switch or the weapon must be seen firing fully automatic to declare it to be an M2 Carbine.''") As for the page, don't use right justification for the weapon images. I fixed the first one for you. Thanks! --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:24, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::If you're unsure about an ID, you can always put them on the talk page and ask for help. As for the M2, I think there are very few real M2s out there, so it's probably safer to assume that they're M1s. (Per the M1 Carbine page: "''There must be a visible selector switch or the weapon must be seen firing fully automatic to declare it to be an M2 Carbine.''") As for the page, don't use right justification for the weapon images. I fixed the first one for you. Thanks! --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:24, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 21 October 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			::::::Well, there are only so many "popular" movies out there. I've done my share of "obscure" movies, believe me. But who knows, maybe someone will see this page and be motivated to see ''Hennessy''. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 21 October 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			:::::Ah, I did indeed mark is as "none", so I think I'm solid now. Still a few guns I'm not 100% on, but I think overall I think it's working out. I'm not sure how many people are actually going to read an write-up on a film this obscure, but it had some cool gun bits and I hadn't done an IMFDB piece before, so hunting screencaps and all has been interesting. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 14:02, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 21 October 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::If you're unsure about an ID, you can always put them on the talk page and ask for help. As for the M2, I think there are very few real M2s out there, so it's probably safer to assume that they're M1s. (Per the M1 Carbine page: "''There must be a visible selector switch or the weapon must be seen firing fully automatic to declare it to be an M2 Carbine.''") As for the page, don't use right justification for the weapon images. I fixed the first one for you. Thanks! --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:24, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		::If you're unsure about an ID, you can always put them on the talk page and ask for help. As for the M2, I think there are very few real M2s out there, so it's probably safer to assume that they're M1s. (Per the M1 Carbine page: "''There must be a visible selector switch or the weapon must be seen firing fully automatic to declare it to be an M2 Carbine.''") As for the page, don't use right justification for the weapon images. I fixed the first one for you. Thanks! --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:24, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)		:::Yep, that's the policy; I believe that scene meets the ''seen firing fully automatic'' requirement, even though it's too dark to see specifics like switches. The RoF shown in the scene is way too fast for an M1, as best as I can figure. They could be converted blank-firing devices in an M1 shell, or some tampering with visual/sound speed, but the overall effect seems to imply the fictional characters are on full-auto. No right justification? Huh, that would seem to lay out better, but if the standard is left justify, I'll move to that. [[User:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|REPLICAwrittendowntheside]] ([[User talk:REPLICAwrittendowntheside\|talk]]) 13:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
			::::Left justify isn't ideal either. Just go with "none". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:00, 21 October 2012 (EDT)