User talk:Orca1 9904 - Revision history

Funkychinaman: /* Produced */ new section

2014-12-24T00:11:42Z

Produced: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 24 December 2014
Line 1,073:		Line 1,073:

	In the future, I would not create a page unless you had screenshots available to upload for it. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)		In the future, I would not create a page unless you had screenshots available to upload for it. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)

			== Produced ==

			It's long been established that the Produced categories are based on who actually produces the film, not where it is actually shot. This is why all new country categories are simply "____ Produced" rather than the misleading "_____ Produced/Filmed". --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 19:11, 23 December 2014 (EST)

Ben41: /* The Last Ship */ new section

2014-01-08T00:42:12Z

The Last Ship: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 8 January 2014
Line 1,069:		Line 1,069:

	I haven't seen ''Iron Eagle'' in about twenty-five years, but if it's like any other plane movie, the actors do very few scenes in the actual planes. Most of their work in done in a [http://youtu.be/YZSK12MXuzQ?t=21m53s cockpit mockup] [http://www.awn.com/articles/reviews/iles-chevaliers-du-cieli-france-s-answer-itop-guni/page/2%2C1 in front of a green screen]. Therefore, unless the actor is in the plane, firing the cannons him/herself, I don't see how that could qualify as actor usage. The ''character'' is piloting the plane and using the cannons, but the ''actor'' is not. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 02:35, 7 July 2013 (EDT)		I haven't seen ''Iron Eagle'' in about twenty-five years, but if it's like any other plane movie, the actors do very few scenes in the actual planes. Most of their work in done in a [http://youtu.be/YZSK12MXuzQ?t=21m53s cockpit mockup] [http://www.awn.com/articles/reviews/iles-chevaliers-du-cieli-france-s-answer-itop-guni/page/2%2C1 in front of a green screen]. Therefore, unless the actor is in the plane, firing the cannons him/herself, I don't see how that could qualify as actor usage. The ''character'' is piloting the plane and using the cannons, but the ''actor'' is not. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 02:35, 7 July 2013 (EDT)

			== The Last Ship ==

			In the future, I would not create a page unless you had screenshots available to upload for it. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)

Funkychinaman: /* Actors and planes */ new section

2013-07-07T06:35:23Z

Actors and planes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 7 July 2013
Line 1,065:		Line 1,065:
	Can you be a bit more specific as to where the flintlock is in "In A Mirror, Darkly, Part 1?" I'm trying to get a cap of it. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (EST)		Can you be a bit more specific as to where the flintlock is in "In A Mirror, Darkly, Part 1?" I'm trying to get a cap of it. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (EST)
	:I got caps of the shotgun. Between me and the OP, we got Archer's wall as well. There's the revolver, which looks like a Colt 1860, and some sort of fowling piece, but I don't see a flintlock pistol. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:53, 23 February 2013 (EST)		:I got caps of the shotgun. Between me and the OP, we got Archer's wall as well. There's the revolver, which looks like a Colt 1860, and some sort of fowling piece, but I don't see a flintlock pistol. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:53, 23 February 2013 (EST)

			== Actors and planes ==

			I haven't seen ''Iron Eagle'' in about twenty-five years, but if it's like any other plane movie, the actors do very few scenes in the actual planes. Most of their work in done in a [http://youtu.be/YZSK12MXuzQ?t=21m53s cockpit mockup] [http://www.awn.com/articles/reviews/iles-chevaliers-du-cieli-france-s-answer-itop-guni/page/2%2C1 in front of a green screen]. Therefore, unless the actor is in the plane, firing the cannons him/herself, I don't see how that could qualify as actor usage. The ''character'' is piloting the plane and using the cannons, but the ''actor'' is not. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 02:35, 7 July 2013 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 01:53, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T01:53:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 24 February 2013
Line 1,064:		Line 1,064:

	Can you be a bit more specific as to where the flintlock is in "In A Mirror, Darkly, Part 1?" I'm trying to get a cap of it. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (EST)		Can you be a bit more specific as to where the flintlock is in "In A Mirror, Darkly, Part 1?" I'm trying to get a cap of it. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (EST)
			:I got caps of the shotgun. Between me and the OP, we got Archer's wall as well. There's the revolver, which looks like a Colt 1860, and some sort of fowling piece, but I don't see a flintlock pistol. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:53, 23 February 2013 (EST)

Funkychinaman: /* Enterprise flintlock */ new section

2013-02-24T01:46:00Z

Enterprise flintlock: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 24 February 2013
Line 1,060:		Line 1,060:

	According to IMDb, the three production companies for ''Iron Eagle'' are TriStar Pictures (an American company), Delphi Films (listed as an American company), and something called Falcon's Flight. According to Google, the full name of Falcon's Flight is Falcon's Flight Inc., which would imply that it's an American company as well. While I don't dispute that it was filmed in Israel, the X Produced/Filmed category is not longer supposed to reflect filming location, only production --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 18:43, 29 June 2012 (CDT)		According to IMDb, the three production companies for ''Iron Eagle'' are TriStar Pictures (an American company), Delphi Films (listed as an American company), and something called Falcon's Flight. According to Google, the full name of Falcon's Flight is Falcon's Flight Inc., which would imply that it's an American company as well. While I don't dispute that it was filmed in Israel, the X Produced/Filmed category is not longer supposed to reflect filming location, only production --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 18:43, 29 June 2012 (CDT)

			== Enterprise flintlock ==

			Can you be a bit more specific as to where the flintlock is in "In A Mirror, Darkly, Part 1?" I'm trying to get a cap of it. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (EST)

Funkychinaman: /* Iron Eagle */ new section

2012-06-29T23:43:11Z

Iron Eagle: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 29 June 2012
Line 1,056:		Line 1,056:

	Hey man! I just wanted to make you aware of a nifty little trick you can use with "STANAG" compatible weapons. If you add their specs and put the line '''<nowiki>* '''Feed System:''' {{STANAG}}</nowiki>''' in there, the <nowiki>{{STANAG}}</nowiki> template will automatically include the STANAG category. I noticed that when you made the page for the [[Coharie Arms CA-415]] you added the category manually at the bottom (which obviously works just fine as well) but just wanted you to know about this little trick. :-) Hope you have a good weekend! --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 10:14, 29 June 2012 (CDT)		Hey man! I just wanted to make you aware of a nifty little trick you can use with "STANAG" compatible weapons. If you add their specs and put the line '''<nowiki>* '''Feed System:''' {{STANAG}}</nowiki>''' in there, the <nowiki>{{STANAG}}</nowiki> template will automatically include the STANAG category. I noticed that when you made the page for the [[Coharie Arms CA-415]] you added the category manually at the bottom (which obviously works just fine as well) but just wanted you to know about this little trick. :-) Hope you have a good weekend! --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 10:14, 29 June 2012 (CDT)

			== Iron Eagle ==

			According to IMDb, the three production companies for ''Iron Eagle'' are TriStar Pictures (an American company), Delphi Films (listed as an American company), and something called Falcon's Flight. According to Google, the full name of Falcon's Flight is Falcon's Flight Inc., which would imply that it's an American company as well. While I don't dispute that it was filmed in Israel, the X Produced/Filmed category is not longer supposed to reflect filming location, only production --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 18:43, 29 June 2012 (CDT)

Zackmann08: /* Coharie Arms CA-415 */ new section

2012-06-29T15:14:55Z

Coharie Arms CA-415: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 29 June 2012
Line 1,052:		Line 1,052:
	Hey man. So I have a request. When you need to link to a particular gun that is a subsection of a larger page (such as the [[M1911]] which is part of the [[M1911 pistol series]]), instead of putting <nowiki>[[M1911 pistol series#M1911\|M1911]]</nowiki>, can you simply put <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki>? (I bring this up cause you used this format on the [[Ken Lesco]] page). The reason for this is 2 fold. One, if the M1911 is ever moved from this page, the other format will no longer work. (Now obviously in THIS case, the M1911 is never going to be moved from the M1911 pistol series page. But we ran into this issue when we reorganized this page and had to redo EVERY page that linked to the Kimber models or the Springfield models, etc.). Secondly, if the subheading is ever changed (say from "M1911" to "Colt M1911", this link will not work any more. In either case of a change happening, the <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki> redirect can simply be changed instead of having to change EVERY page. Does that make sense?? I'm trying to make this easier so that it will work better in the future. I know this is a little confusing so let me know if I don't make sense. You can also see the discussion about this [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?p=35266#post35266 in the forum]. Again, NOT trying to tell you what to do or say your screwing up, just trying to make an improvement going forward. :-) --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:21, 19 June 2012 (CDT)		Hey man. So I have a request. When you need to link to a particular gun that is a subsection of a larger page (such as the [[M1911]] which is part of the [[M1911 pistol series]]), instead of putting <nowiki>[[M1911 pistol series#M1911\|M1911]]</nowiki>, can you simply put <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki>? (I bring this up cause you used this format on the [[Ken Lesco]] page). The reason for this is 2 fold. One, if the M1911 is ever moved from this page, the other format will no longer work. (Now obviously in THIS case, the M1911 is never going to be moved from the M1911 pistol series page. But we ran into this issue when we reorganized this page and had to redo EVERY page that linked to the Kimber models or the Springfield models, etc.). Secondly, if the subheading is ever changed (say from "M1911" to "Colt M1911", this link will not work any more. In either case of a change happening, the <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki> redirect can simply be changed instead of having to change EVERY page. Does that make sense?? I'm trying to make this easier so that it will work better in the future. I know this is a little confusing so let me know if I don't make sense. You can also see the discussion about this [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?p=35266#post35266 in the forum]. Again, NOT trying to tell you what to do or say your screwing up, just trying to make an improvement going forward. :-) --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:21, 19 June 2012 (CDT)
	:Did that make ANY sense at all? :-\ --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 11:10, 21 June 2012 (CDT)		:Did that make ANY sense at all? :-\ --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 11:10, 21 June 2012 (CDT)

			== Coharie Arms CA-415 ==

			Hey man! I just wanted to make you aware of a nifty little trick you can use with "STANAG" compatible weapons. If you add their specs and put the line '''<nowiki>* '''Feed System:''' {{STANAG}}</nowiki>''' in there, the <nowiki>{{STANAG}}</nowiki> template will automatically include the STANAG category. I noticed that when you made the page for the [[Coharie Arms CA-415]] you added the category manually at the bottom (which obviously works just fine as well) but just wanted you to know about this little trick. :-) Hope you have a good weekend! --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 10:14, 29 June 2012 (CDT)

Zackmann08: /* Redirects. */

2012-06-21T16:10:36Z

Redirects.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 21 June 2012
Line 1,051:		Line 1,051:

	Hey man. So I have a request. When you need to link to a particular gun that is a subsection of a larger page (such as the [[M1911]] which is part of the [[M1911 pistol series]]), instead of putting <nowiki>[[M1911 pistol series#M1911\|M1911]]</nowiki>, can you simply put <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki>? (I bring this up cause you used this format on the [[Ken Lesco]] page). The reason for this is 2 fold. One, if the M1911 is ever moved from this page, the other format will no longer work. (Now obviously in THIS case, the M1911 is never going to be moved from the M1911 pistol series page. But we ran into this issue when we reorganized this page and had to redo EVERY page that linked to the Kimber models or the Springfield models, etc.). Secondly, if the subheading is ever changed (say from "M1911" to "Colt M1911", this link will not work any more. In either case of a change happening, the <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki> redirect can simply be changed instead of having to change EVERY page. Does that make sense?? I'm trying to make this easier so that it will work better in the future. I know this is a little confusing so let me know if I don't make sense. You can also see the discussion about this [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?p=35266#post35266 in the forum]. Again, NOT trying to tell you what to do or say your screwing up, just trying to make an improvement going forward. :-) --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:21, 19 June 2012 (CDT)		Hey man. So I have a request. When you need to link to a particular gun that is a subsection of a larger page (such as the [[M1911]] which is part of the [[M1911 pistol series]]), instead of putting <nowiki>[[M1911 pistol series#M1911\|M1911]]</nowiki>, can you simply put <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki>? (I bring this up cause you used this format on the [[Ken Lesco]] page). The reason for this is 2 fold. One, if the M1911 is ever moved from this page, the other format will no longer work. (Now obviously in THIS case, the M1911 is never going to be moved from the M1911 pistol series page. But we ran into this issue when we reorganized this page and had to redo EVERY page that linked to the Kimber models or the Springfield models, etc.). Secondly, if the subheading is ever changed (say from "M1911" to "Colt M1911", this link will not work any more. In either case of a change happening, the <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki> redirect can simply be changed instead of having to change EVERY page. Does that make sense?? I'm trying to make this easier so that it will work better in the future. I know this is a little confusing so let me know if I don't make sense. You can also see the discussion about this [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?p=35266#post35266 in the forum]. Again, NOT trying to tell you what to do or say your screwing up, just trying to make an improvement going forward. :-) --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:21, 19 June 2012 (CDT)
			:Did that make ANY sense at all? :-\ --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 11:10, 21 June 2012 (CDT)

Zackmann08: /* Redirects. */ new section

2012-06-20T04:21:37Z

Redirects.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 20 June 2012
Line 1,047:		Line 1,047:
	Why did you mark [[Battleship (2012)]] as incomplete??? It's only been in theaters for 4 days so its clearly still an [[:Category:Upcoming\|upcoming]] movie... --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 22:10, 22 May 2012 (CDT)		Why did you mark [[Battleship (2012)]] as incomplete??? It's only been in theaters for 4 days so its clearly still an [[:Category:Upcoming\|upcoming]] movie... --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 22:10, 22 May 2012 (CDT)
	:You are mistaken. Upcoming is for media that is not yet out on DVD thus it is not possible for there to be any more images from it. That is why in the "Upcoming" template it says "Any screenshots used are from official Trailers". --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:55, 22 May 2012 (CDT)		:You are mistaken. Upcoming is for media that is not yet out on DVD thus it is not possible for there to be any more images from it. That is why in the "Upcoming" template it says "Any screenshots used are from official Trailers". --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:55, 22 May 2012 (CDT)

			== Redirects. ==

			Hey man. So I have a request. When you need to link to a particular gun that is a subsection of a larger page (such as the [[M1911]] which is part of the [[M1911 pistol series]]), instead of putting <nowiki>[[M1911 pistol series#M1911\|M1911]]</nowiki>, can you simply put <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki>? (I bring this up cause you used this format on the [[Ken Lesco]] page). The reason for this is 2 fold. One, if the M1911 is ever moved from this page, the other format will no longer work. (Now obviously in THIS case, the M1911 is never going to be moved from the M1911 pistol series page. But we ran into this issue when we reorganized this page and had to redo EVERY page that linked to the Kimber models or the Springfield models, etc.). Secondly, if the subheading is ever changed (say from "M1911" to "Colt M1911", this link will not work any more. In either case of a change happening, the <nowiki>[[M1911]]</nowiki> redirect can simply be changed instead of having to change EVERY page. Does that make sense?? I'm trying to make this easier so that it will work better in the future. I know this is a little confusing so let me know if I don't make sense. You can also see the discussion about this [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?p=35266#post35266 in the forum]. Again, NOT trying to tell you what to do or say your screwing up, just trying to make an improvement going forward. :-) --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:21, 19 June 2012 (CDT)

Zackmann08: /* Battleship */

2012-05-23T04:55:39Z

Battleship

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 23 May 2012
Line 1,046:		Line 1,046:

	Why did you mark [[Battleship (2012)]] as incomplete??? It's only been in theaters for 4 days so its clearly still an [[:Category:Upcoming\|upcoming]] movie... --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 22:10, 22 May 2012 (CDT)		Why did you mark [[Battleship (2012)]] as incomplete??? It's only been in theaters for 4 days so its clearly still an [[:Category:Upcoming\|upcoming]] movie... --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 22:10, 22 May 2012 (CDT)
			:You are mistaken. Upcoming is for media that is not yet out on DVD thus it is not possible for there to be any more images from it. That is why in the "Upcoming" template it says "Any screenshots used are from official Trailers". --[[User:Zackmann08\|Zackmann08]] 23:55, 22 May 2012 (CDT)