User talk:Mateogala - Revision history

Get Em Puppy: /* Nambu Type II */

2023-11-25T17:46:42Z

Nambu Type II

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 25 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Nambu Type II ==		== Nambu Type II ==

	The Nambu Model II is a real gun but the photos that I removed from the Enlisted page were modern non-functioning replicas made by Japanese hobbyists. The real gun that the Enlisted model is based on is currently in an American private collection.		The Nambu Model II is a real gun but the photos that I removed from the Enlisted page were modern non-functioning replicas made by Japanese hobbyists. The real gun that the Enlisted model is based on is currently in an American private collection. [[User:Get Em Puppy\|Get Em Puppy]] ([[User talk:Get Em Puppy\|talk]]) 17:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Get Em Puppy: /* Nambu Type II */ new section

2023-11-25T17:46:06Z

Nambu Type II: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:46, 25 November 2023
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== Nambu Type II ==

		The Nambu Model II is a real gun but the photos that I removed from the Enlisted page were modern non-functioning replicas made by Japanese hobbyists. The real gun that the Enlisted model is based on is currently in an American private collection.

Mateogala: Blanked the page

2023-11-13T16:45:37Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 13 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== RE:Breakpoint ==~~

	Ah, if you're planning to take reloading shots from a different perspective, that makes sense, though for future reference you can just keep them there until you have replacements. Also, why do you blank your talk page so often? [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:13, 13 December 2019 (EST)
	:Also, does Breakpoint allow for first-person aiming down the sights like the last game? For instance here's one I have on the ''Wildlands'' page. These would be good on the ''Breakpoint'' page if you're interested.
	~~:[[File:GRW MP5 (2).jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Aiming the MP5 at the sky.]]~~
	Look, it's a wiki, no one "owns" a page. And while I recognize the work you've put into it and the sanctity of the WIP tag, it's been four months now, and it's not unreasonable for other people to contribute. Please work out a compromise. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:15, 28 January 2020 (EST)
	~~== Cleanup Sniper Elite III ==~~

	~~Can you please clean up your copy pasted image captions on [[Sniper Elite III]]? --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 21:14, 16 December 2019 (EST)~~

	~~== Death to Spies ==~~

	While I appreciate your efforts in adding additional screencaps to the ''Death to Spies'' page, I don't understand the other changes you made. You restructured several things that didn't really need to be restructured, and arguably made them worse in the process (e.g. the merger of grenades and landmines, which results in an awkward block of two notes at the start of the section), and you removed several good images with noteworthy information (e.g. the PPS-43 loading screen image), then nuke-tagged them, and replaced them with shots that, while clean, are nearly all identical, and have copy-pasted captions on them. For future reference, please don't do things of this nature. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 18:08, 11 April 2021 (EDT)

	~~== Meaning of "Łucznik" ==~~

	Since you're Polish, I have a quick question about [[Fabryka Broni Radom\|Fabryka Broni "Łucznik"]] that I want to ask: what does the word "Łucznik" in the company's name mean? What's the history of this name? --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 03:53, 15 April 2021 (EDT)
	~~:Thank you Mateogala. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 02:20, 16 April 2021 (EDT)~~

	~~==S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky==~~
	Hi. I hope you don't mind, but I already have plans to add more screenshots to that page; the first of these may be of the M1911 and the LR 300. If this can't work out somehow, how do you think that we could work out a solution? [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 16:57, 7 May 2021 (EDT)
	~~:Thanks! [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 06:06, 8 May 2021 (EDT)~~
	::I took a small break in order to figure out some stuff with my recording software (and I decided to catch up with some other projects in the meantime); now that that's settled, I will hopefully get some new screenshots in the next few days or so. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 17:27, 9 June 2021 (EDT)

	~~==State of Decay==~~
	I told you already - don't remove existing screencaps when you're reworking a page. The close-up gun model and inventory menu images were useful, since they let the reader see the gun models and descriptions clearly without having to open the image at full size. Please put them back into their respective sections - I don't have time to fix your mistakes again. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 07:20, 15 June 2021 (EDT)
	:Fair enough, but the original screencaps should still stay. We have several pages already that use model viewers/etc. to get clearer looks at guns (the ''[[Resident Evil 6]]'' page is a good example, especially since, like ''SoD'', it's a TPS where you don't see the guns all that clearly in-game, so the non-standard screencaps can be a major help. As for the old journal entry shots vs. the new ones, the new shots make it harder to see the actual journal entry about the gun. I'd be fine if both stayed, but removing the old one makes it harder to read the important details without viewing the image at full size, and with a game that has this many guns, that's not really feasible.

	:Anyway, regarding your unknown guns, the "CLEO Striker 40" ("Striker" isn't actually all-caps in-game; note that the first letter is slightly bigger than the rest in the journal entry) is a full-sized [[SIG-Sauer P250]]; the "CLEO Revo C" is a [[Chiappa Rhino 40DS]]; the "R12K Dragon" is a tricked-out [[Saiga 12K]] (and you may want to point out that incendiary shells probably wouldn't cycle a Saiga, unless it'd been modified); the "CLEO HCQB" is an [[Ak 5C]] without a stock; and the "CLEO DMR" is an [[M110]]/[[SR-25]] derivative, rather than an [[AR-15]] (note the angled upper without a forward assist, and the longer magazine well). Sorry if I sounded confrontational/rude earlier; I was tired. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 09:57, 15 June 2021 (EDT)

	~~== State of Decay 2 ==~~

	~~Just giving you a hand, it might help you faster.~~
	~~[[User:I'mallaboutguns.1\|I'mallaboutguns.1]] ([[User talk:I'mallaboutguns.1\|talk]]) 10:45, 23 June 2021 (EDT)~~

	~~== Russian Berdan caliber ==~~

	Please pay attention [[Talk:Berdan Rifle#Russian Berdan caliber - 10.67 vs 10.75 mm\|to this]]. 10.67 mm caliber is not an error, there are reasons for such a designation, and this issue needs more discussion, as I think. Thanks. --[[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 00:59, 22 November 2021 (EST)

	~~== Are you available at Discord or Steam? ==~~
	Hi, sorry for the sudden question, a friend of mine wants to ask you a couple of questions about Enlisted but doesn't have an account here.[[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 09:10, 7 June 2022 (EDT)

	~~:thanks, I'll message him asap. [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 06:43, 8 June 2022 (EDT)~~

	~~== Pavesi rifles ==~~

	The source you used (through no fault of your own) is wrong. The "Pavesi Model 1938" was patented in 1938, but is actually marked SEMIAUTOMATICO CAL. 8 MOD. 1942 - BRESCIA on the top of the receiver. This can clearly be seen on the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pJ751Mui64 Forgotten Weapons video about the rifle]. Therefore the correct designation is Pavesi Mod. 1942.
	The "Pavesi Model 1942" - the SVT copy - is likewise not actually called the Model 1942. No formal designation for this rifle has been found but the Beretta museum, who currently hold the prototype, call it the "Pavesi Mod. PG", with "PG" standing for "Presa Gas" ("Gas Pressure", as in gas-operated).
	~~--[[User:Get Em Puppy\|Get Em Puppy]] ([[User talk:Get Em Puppy\|talk]]) 17:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)~~

	~~== Discord ==~~

	Do you have a Discord account? I want to add you as a friend on Discord. I have a few things that I want to talk with you about privately. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 17:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

	~~== Recent Edits ==~~

	Why have you been removing screenshots from pages? Some of those shots were important, and you've either uploaded insufficient replacements (e.g. not adding a new reloading shot for the Schiessbecher on the ''[[Medal of Honor: Airborne]]'' page) or none at all (e.g. the 21 cm Mörser 16 on the ''[[Battlefield 1]]'' page). I'm going to re-add those images soon - in the future, if you want to replace an image, just upload a new version, instead of removing existing images entirely. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 12:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

	~~== New Weapon Category ==~~

	~~We talked about it on Discord, go for it, it's in line with some other changes we're thinking about. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 01:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)~~

	~~== Re: Enlisted ==~~
	There are 4 Type 99 Arisakas that I've found in the editor: the "short" one (the as early war standard one that is not present in Pacific campaign), the sniper one, the late war one and the long one that is event exclusive. The short entry was redundant because it already described the rifle that was described before. Although, I did mess up and should have moved the photos from short version to the one that is currently listed just as Type 99 instead of outright removing it, my bad. [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 13:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

	~~[[File:Enlisted editor type99s.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Case in point]]~~

	:About the Thompsons: I left 50-round drum vertical foregrip Tommy as a M1921AC because it's the only Tommy gun to be explicitly named as 1921ac in the editor, plus all the markings seem to match, don't know about the stats.

	:For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

	~~== Howitzers ==~~

	~~Per the [[Rules]], "the only weapons which merit an individual page in the GUNS Category are any individual or crew served weapon th~~
	at fires in a DIRECT FIRE role." "What we do not allow are weapons which are too large to be operated by either an individual or small crew or are used primarily as indirect fire delivery systems. This disqualifies fuel air bombs, all air dropped bombs, artillery, IEDs, most explosive ordnance (other than a commonly issued grenade), cruise missiles, or the guns on a Naval battleship. " Howitzers are indirect fire weapons, and thus, ineligible. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

	~~== Death to Spies ==~~

	~~No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)~~

	~~==List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces==~~
	My understanding of the policy is that the currently-existing lists for the US, UK, France, Germany, and Russia get to stay because their armed forces appear frequently enough in media to warrant a list to help identify things like anachronisms. New "lists of weapons used by armed forces" pages aren't allowed to be made because: 1) they are pushing the scope for what this website is for, 2) none of them have been fully completed, and 3) their armed forces don't appear frequently enough to warrant pages. Also, pages for the [[List_of_firearms_used_by_the_Israel_Defense_Forces\|IDF]], [[List of firearms used by Australian Defence Forces\|ADF]], and [[List of firearms used by the People's Liberation Army\|PLA]] have all previously existed and deleted on the grounds that they do not appear enough to warrant pages - and they were all made in 2012. So your all-or-nothing argument that if the Polish Armed Forces page is deleted then all the others have to go too because they were also made in 2012 - even though those pages are specifically grandfathered in - doesn't really hold water. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 11:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
	:I get that there are movies, games etc. that do feature Polish military forces, but they still aren't on the same amount like the US or Russia - and those two countries have more users and appear more frequently in media for a reason. And also, I don't get to make the policy, I just follow it - I'm not an admin, just a lowly user. And the policy is that no new pages of this type can be made. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 12:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

TheExplodingBarrel: /* List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces */

2023-10-31T12:22:11Z

List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 31 October 2023
Line 79:		Line 79:
	No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)		No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

	== List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces ==		==List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces==

	My understanding of the policy is that the currently-existing lists for the US, UK, France, Germany, and Russia get to stay because their armed forces appear frequently enough in media to warrant a list to help identify things like anachronisms. New "lists of weapons used by armed forces" pages aren't allowed to be made because: 1) they are pushing the scope for what this website is for, 2) none of them have been fully completed, and 3) their armed forces don't appear frequently enough to warrant pages. Also, pages for the [[List_of_firearms_used_by_the_Israel_Defense_Forces\|IDF]], [[List of firearms used by Australian Defence Forces\|ADF]], and [[List of firearms used by the People's Liberation Army\|PLA]] have all previously existed and deleted on the grounds that they do not appear enough to warrant pages - and they were all made in 2012. So your all-or-nothing argument that if the Polish Armed Forces page is deleted then all the others have to go too because they were also made in 2012 - even though those pages are specifically grandfathered in - doesn't really hold water. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 11:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)		My understanding of the policy is that the currently-existing lists for the US, UK, France, Germany, and Russia get to stay because their armed forces appear frequently enough in media to warrant a list to help identify things like anachronisms. New "lists of weapons used by armed forces" pages aren't allowed to be made because: 1) they are pushing the scope for what this website is for, 2) none of them have been fully completed, and 3) their armed forces don't appear frequently enough to warrant pages. Also, pages for the [[List_of_firearms_used_by_the_Israel_Defense_Forces\|IDF]], [[List of firearms used by Australian Defence Forces\|ADF]], and [[List of firearms used by the People's Liberation Army\|PLA]] have all previously existed and deleted on the grounds that they do not appear enough to warrant pages - and they were all made in 2012. So your all-or-nothing argument that if the Polish Armed Forces page is deleted then all the others have to go too because they were also made in 2012 - even though those pages are specifically grandfathered in - doesn't really hold water. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 11:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
			:I get that there are movies, games etc. that do feature Polish military forces, but they still aren't on the same amount like the US or Russia - and those two countries have more users and appear more frequently in media for a reason. And also, I don't get to make the policy, I just follow it - I'm not an admin, just a lowly user. And the policy is that no new pages of this type can be made. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 12:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

TheExplodingBarrel: /* List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces */ new section

2023-10-31T11:53:31Z

List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 31 October 2023
Line 78:		Line 78:

	No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)		No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

			== List of firearms used by Polish Armed Forces ==

			My understanding of the policy is that the currently-existing lists for the US, UK, France, Germany, and Russia get to stay because their armed forces appear frequently enough in media to warrant a list to help identify things like anachronisms. New "lists of weapons used by armed forces" pages aren't allowed to be made because: 1) they are pushing the scope for what this website is for, 2) none of them have been fully completed, and 3) their armed forces don't appear frequently enough to warrant pages. Also, pages for the [[List_of_firearms_used_by_the_Israel_Defense_Forces\|IDF]], [[List of firearms used by Australian Defence Forces\|ADF]], and [[List of firearms used by the People's Liberation Army\|PLA]] have all previously existed and deleted on the grounds that they do not appear enough to warrant pages - and they were all made in 2012. So your all-or-nothing argument that if the Polish Armed Forces page is deleted then all the others have to go too because they were also made in 2012 - even though those pages are specifically grandfathered in - doesn't really hold water. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 11:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Samz at 13:34, 30 May 2023

2023-05-30T13:34:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 30 May 2023
Line 77:		Line 77:
	== Death to Spies ==		== Death to Spies ==

	No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:~~Mateogala~~\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)		No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Samz\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Samz at 13:33, 30 May 2023

2023-05-30T13:33:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 30 May 2023
Line 72:		Line 72:
	== Howitzers ==		== Howitzers ==

	Per the [[Rules]], "the only weapons which merit an individual page in the GUNS Category are any individual or crew served weapon ~~that~~ fires in a DIRECT FIRE role." "What we do not allow are weapons which are too large to be operated by either an individual or small crew or are used primarily as indirect fire delivery systems. This disqualifies fuel air bombs, all air dropped bombs, artillery, IEDs, most explosive ordnance (other than a commonly issued grenade), cruise missiles, or the guns on a Naval battleship. " Howitzers are indirect fire weapons, and thus, ineligible. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)		Per the [[Rules]], "the only weapons which merit an individual page in the GUNS Category are any individual or crew served weapon th
			at fires in a DIRECT FIRE role." "What we do not allow are weapons which are too large to be operated by either an individual or small crew or are used primarily as indirect fire delivery systems. This disqualifies fuel air bombs, all air dropped bombs, artillery, IEDs, most explosive ordnance (other than a commonly issued grenade), cruise missiles, or the guns on a Naval battleship. " Howitzers are indirect fire weapons, and thus, ineligible. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

			== Death to Spies ==

			No problem, I'm a big fan of these games so I enjoy updating the pages. --[[User:Samz]] ([[User talk:Mateogala\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Funkychinaman: /* Howitzers */ new section

2023-03-06T19:39:27Z

Howitzers: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 6 March 2023
Line 69:		Line 69:

	:For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)		:For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

			== Howitzers ==

			Per the [[Rules]], "the only weapons which merit an individual page in the GUNS Category are any individual or crew served weapon that fires in a DIRECT FIRE role." "What we do not allow are weapons which are too large to be operated by either an individual or small crew or are used primarily as indirect fire delivery systems. This disqualifies fuel air bombs, all air dropped bombs, artillery, IEDs, most explosive ordnance (other than a commonly issued grenade), cruise missiles, or the guns on a Naval battleship. " Howitzers are indirect fire weapons, and thus, ineligible. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Lunar Watcher: /* Re: Enlisted */

2023-02-06T22:38:18Z

Re: Enlisted

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 6 February 2023
Line 68:		Line 68:
	:About the Thompsons: I left 50-round drum vertical foregrip Tommy as a M1921AC because it's the only Tommy gun to be explicitly named as 1921ac in the editor, plus all the markings seem to match, don't know about the stats.		:About the Thompsons: I left 50-round drum vertical foregrip Tommy as a M1921AC because it's the only Tommy gun to be explicitly named as 1921ac in the editor, plus all the markings seem to match, don't know about the stats.

	For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)		:For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Lunar Watcher at 22:37, 6 February 2023

2023-02-06T22:37:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 6 February 2023
Line 62:		Line 62:

	== Re: Enlisted ==		== Re: Enlisted ==
	There are 4 Type 99 Arisakas that I've found in the editor: the "short" one (the early war standard one that is not present in Pacific campaign), the sniper one, the late war one and the long one that is event exclusive. The short entry was redundant because it already described the rifle that was described before. Although, I did mess up and should have moved the photos from short version to the one that is currently listed just as Type 99 instead of outright removing it, my bad. [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 13:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)		There are 4 Type 99 Arisakas that I've found in the editor: the "short" one (the as early war standard one that is not present in Pacific campaign), the sniper one, the late war one and the long one that is event exclusive. The short entry was redundant because it already described the rifle that was described before. Although, I did mess up and should have moved the photos from short version to the one that is currently listed just as Type 99 instead of outright removing it, my bad. [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 13:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

	[[File:Enlisted editor type99s.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Case in point]]		[[File:Enlisted editor type99s.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Case in point]]

			:About the Thompsons: I left 50-round drum vertical foregrip Tommy as a M1921AC because it's the only Tommy gun to be explicitly named as 1921ac in the editor, plus all the markings seem to match, don't know about the stats.

			For whatever reason, view models of 30-round and 20-round Thompsons seem to have different textures compared to their world model, with them mentioning a U.S. Navy and having an overstamped 8 number in the model number, while the worldmodel of both of them apparently uses the same markings as the 50-round drum version, with no mention of the U.S. Navy and original M1921 markings [[User:Lunar Watcher\|Lunar Watcher]] ([[User talk:Lunar Watcher\|talk]]) 22:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)