User talk:Jeddostotle7 - Revision history

Evil Tim: /* Personal attack */

2012-09-04T07:07:04Z

Personal attack

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 4 September 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)		Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)
			:Yes, the reason I reverted it was the other half (you saying he couldn't do that when he could). But just to explain, you're both ''kind of'' right there. He's talking specifically about the never-adopted STANAG 4179 (which would have specifically standardised the M16 30-round magazine in NATO weapons), you're talking about the magazine standards which evolved out of that STANAG and instead standardised the dimensions of the M16 magwell in a lot of NATO weapons. ''Strictly'' I don't think there was ever a STANAG document regarding 5.56mm magwell dimensions, which is why the G36 and earlier FAMAS iterations aren't compatible with M16-style magazines even though Germany and France are part of NATO. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 02:07, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

Jeddostotle7: /* Personal attack */

2012-09-03T20:26:04Z

Personal attack

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 3 September 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)		Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

	~~:I removed the "Personal Attack" thing when I reverted his reversion of my comment. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 11:28, 3 September 2012 (CDT)~~

Jeddostotle7: /* Personal attack */

2012-09-03T16:29:12Z

Personal attack

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 3 September 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)		Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

	:I removed the "Personal Attack" thing. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 11:28, 3 September 2012 (CDT)		:I removed the "Personal Attack" thing when I reverted his reversion of my comment. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 11:28, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

Jeddostotle7: /* Personal attack */

2012-09-03T16:28:43Z

Personal attack

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 3 September 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)		Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

			:I removed the "Personal Attack" thing. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 11:28, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

Evil Tim: /* Personal attack */ new section

2012-09-03T06:59:16Z

Personal attack: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 3 September 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_Die_Autobahnpolizei&diff=next&oldid=521985 please do not clutter pages with comments]. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)		When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_Die_Autobahnpolizei&diff=next&oldid=521985 please do not clutter pages with comments]. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)
	:Oh, sorry, I've just seen other people doing it, and I thought it was what we were supposed to do. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 8:00, 19 February 2012 (PST)		:Oh, sorry, I've just seen other people doing it, and I thought it was what we were supposed to do. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 8:00, 19 February 2012 (PST)

			== Personal attack ==

			Actually, he does do that kind of thing. There are rules requiring certain basic standards of etiquette in discussions, and a member is perfectly entitled to remove a post that breaks them. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 01:59, 3 September 2012 (CDT)

Jeddostotle7: /* Alarm für Cobra 11 */

2012-02-19T16:00:29Z

Alarm für Cobra 11

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 19 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Alarm für Cobra 11==		==Alarm für Cobra 11==
	When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_Die_Autobahnpolizei&diff=next&oldid=521985 please do not clutter pages with comments]. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)		When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_Die_Autobahnpolizei&diff=next&oldid=521985 please do not clutter pages with comments]. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)
			:Oh, sorry, I've just seen other people doing it, and I thought it was what we were supposed to do. [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 8:00, 19 February 2012 (PST)

PistolJunkie: Created page with "==Alarm für Cobra 11== When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_..."

2012-02-18T20:54:23Z

Created page with "==Alarm für Cobra 11== When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_..."

New page

==Alarm für Cobra 11==
When you think you've found an error, either correct it or mention it on the talk page; [http://www.imfdb.org/w/index.php?title=Alarm_f%C3%BCr_Cobra_11_-_Die_Autobahnpolizei&diff=next&oldid=521985 please do not clutter pages with comments]. We try to keep pages looking neat and professional.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 14:54, 18 February 2012 (CST)