User talk:Gunman69 - Revision history

Gunman69: Removing all content from page

2010-08-20T03:04:30Z

Removing all content from page

MT2008: /* Please no PNGs */

2010-06-06T18:01:58Z

Please no PNGs

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 6 June 2010
Line 217:		Line 217:
	==Please no PNGs==		==Please no PNGs==
	I figured this was an accident, but IMFDB doesn't like PNGs. JPEGS is the preferred format for pics. Thanks. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)		I figured this was an accident, but IMFDB doesn't like PNGs. JPEGS is the preferred format for pics. Thanks. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

			==Lethal Weapon S&W=

			Why did you change the pages for ''[[Lethal Weapon]]'' to say that Danny Glover's S&W is a 659? Long Mountain Outfitters has pictures of that exact gun, and they clearly say it's a S&W 5906 older-model. See here: http://www.longmountain.com/just-for-fun/movie-guns/LethalWeapon/

			-[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 18:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 00:52, 30 May 2010

2010-05-30T00:52:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 30 May 2010
Line 214:		Line 214:

	:Check the forum. http://www.imfdb.org/forum/showthread.php?t=864 --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)		:Check the forum. http://www.imfdb.org/forum/showthread.php?t=864 --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

			==Please no PNGs==
			I figured this was an accident, but IMFDB doesn't like PNGs. JPEGS is the preferred format for pics. Thanks. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Predator20: /* RE RD */

2010-01-14T06:00:28Z

RE RD

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 14 January 2010
Line 212:		Line 212:
	==RE RD==		==RE RD==
	I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality.(not that Yournamehere pics were bad quality, you stated your reasons for redoing it and were valid) Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality.(not that Yournamehere pics were bad quality, you stated your reasons for redoing it and were valid) Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

			:Check the forum. http://www.imfdb.org/forum/showthread.php?t=864 --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Predator20: /* RE RD */

2009-11-22T23:20:14Z

RE RD

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 22 November 2009
Line 211:		Line 211:
	I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
	==RE RD==		==RE RD==
	I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality. Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality.(not that Yournamehere pics were bad quality, you stated your reasons for redoing it and were valid) Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Predator20: /* RE: Reservoir Dogs */

2009-11-22T23:11:24Z

RE: Reservoir Dogs

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 22 November 2009
Line 210:		Line 210:

	I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
			==RE RD==
	I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality. Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality. Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Predator20: /* RE: Reservoir Dogs */

2009-11-22T23:10:54Z

RE: Reservoir Dogs

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 22 November 2009
Line 210:		Line 210:

	I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)		I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

			I get what you mean about the "VS" thing. If you looked at the comparison pics I threw up, yours did have a better color, Gunman. When it comes to redoing pages other people have worked on and completed, I don't see the point unless it's half-assed, pics missing, or really bad quality. Doing that kind of work could be put to better use on another page that needs help bad. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 23:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Yournamehere at 21:47, 22 November 2009

2009-11-22T21:47:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 22 November 2009
Line 202:		Line 202:
	'''IMFDB is the only place in the WORLD, now that has these images. How cool is that?''' :) I got some screen used muskets from Last of the Mohicans (from private collections), which is interesting since I usually don't get many pre 1848 weapons.		'''IMFDB is the only place in the WORLD, now that has these images. How cool is that?''' :) I got some screen used muskets from Last of the Mohicans (from private collections), which is interesting since I usually don't get many pre 1848 weapons.
	[[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 03:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)		[[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 03:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

			==RE: Reservoir Dogs==

			First of all, no need to be rude. While not the original author of the page, I was the one who initially revamped it, so I more or less claim it as my own work. I've had conflicts with consultation of "original" authors and now I like to see someone at least post on the forums when they are going to redo a page just so someone gets a chance to weigh whether or not the page should be changed.

			Second, it's highly debatable whether or not your screencaps are "better". Mine are all .png files and while they take longer to load, they come out much clearer than .jpeg files so they are easier to see. Mine are also marginally bigger as well as clearer, so you can note certain features on the S&W second generation pistols (such as the barrel bushing) and distinguish them from third gens, which is very common for people to do when they watch Reservoir Dogs. It allows me to put my foot down and say "No, it's a second gen, here's my proof". Finally, they were all poorly trimmed and there is still some black border around all of them. Whether or nit Windscreen is preferred varies with the user, I jsut so happen to be on the side of full screen as the images are easier to crop.

			I really appreciate you putting in the screen used guns, as I didn't know MPM had gotten pictures of them, but to go and redo all the screenshots, which were arguably worse than mine, was a bit much, and that is why I reverted it. I'll go on the forum and have everyone have their say on which is better. [[User:Yournamehere\|Yournamehere]] 21:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 03:31, 12 November 2009

2009-11-12T03:31:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:31, 12 November 2009
Line 183:		Line 183:
	Thanks. I seem to go more for the classics. I'm not a big fan of Glocks, while they're super reliable and can take a lot of abuse. They're just ugly to me. HK's are not bad looking guns, neither are SIG's but they're pricey. For some the reliability is all that matters, but looks matter to me too. I just picked up a Beretta 92FS Inox a week ago. Whenever the scope for my L1A1 and flash hider for the Mini-14 come in, I'll take some pics of my long guns and the new to me Inox. The only reason I purchased the Inox was my Grandma was needing a larger gun than the .22 Colt Challenger she had. So I traded my 92F for it. I need more revolvers I only have one currently. So maybe two of those will be next purchases. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		Thanks. I seem to go more for the classics. I'm not a big fan of Glocks, while they're super reliable and can take a lot of abuse. They're just ugly to me. HK's are not bad looking guns, neither are SIG's but they're pricey. For some the reliability is all that matters, but looks matter to me too. I just picked up a Beretta 92FS Inox a week ago. Whenever the scope for my L1A1 and flash hider for the Mini-14 come in, I'll take some pics of my long guns and the new to me Inox. The only reason I purchased the Inox was my Grandma was needing a larger gun than the .22 Colt Challenger she had. So I traded my 92F for it. I need more revolvers I only have one currently. So maybe two of those will be next purchases. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
	:I'll take a snap of it. The Colt Woodsman and Challenger look almost the same only the grip is different (could just be the grip panels). You can't see the grip in the screenshot. Browning also made the Challenger. (Browning designed it) --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		:I'll take a snap of it. The Colt Woodsman and Challenger look almost the same only the grip is different (could just be the grip panels). You can't see the grip in the screenshot. Browning also made the Challenger. (Browning designed it) --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			==You won't believe this==
			Score! I've been holding off uploading these because I'm still waiting on an image for the [[Heartbreak Ridge']] page (their weapons are set up slightly differently) so I hope people will wait to update that page until I can get a good image for that page.

			===Say Hello to My Little Friend!!!===
			[[Scarface]] fans will crap in their pants. Got the ACTUAL '''screen used''' LITTLE FRIEND. Now I used black gaffers tape and taped two 30 round magazines together as best I could (to try to match the screenshots). Do you think that was smart? or should I just present it with a plain magazine? Anyway, I did that because I wanted people to see it as it was most seen in the movie (Wow that launcher is beat up, it's been 25 years after all since the movie was filmed!!!!) It is also the old launchers that were used before the Cobray 37mm launchers became prevalent.
			[[Image:M16A1M203ScarfaceCombo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Tony Montanas' 'Little Friend' from the movie [[Scarface]] - Motion Picture Faux M203 launcher attached to M16A1 - 5.56mm/39mm]]

			===Screen used Zabala Shotgun===
			This IS the gun used by 'The Skull' [[Gino Silva]] to blast Tony Montana in the movie. I also included a closeup shot of the top of the gun to show the markings.
			[[Image:SBS-Shotgun_Scarface.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Screen used side by side Spanish Zabala Shotgun from the movie [[Scarface]] - 12 gauge]]
			[[Image:SBS-ShotgunTOP_Scarface.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Top of the Screen used side by side Spanish Zabala Shotgun from the movie [[Scarface]] - 12 gauge. Note manufacturer markings on the top of the shotgun.]]

			===RUN! GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!!!===
			Recognize this lovely? I've been waiting to get pics for the [[Predator]] page for a while. So many weapons have either been sold off or taken apart and reconfigured for other movies.
			[[Image:M16M203PredatorCombo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Motion Picture Faux M203 launcher attached to M16/SP1 Rilfe - 5.56mm/39mm. Configured as it appeared in the movie.]]

			'''IMFDB is the only place in the WORLD, now that has these images. How cool is that?''' :) I got some screen used muskets from Last of the Mohicans (from private collections), which is interesting since I usually don't get many pre 1848 weapons.
			[[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 03:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Predator20: /* Re My Guns */

2009-11-11T22:56:20Z

Re My Guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 11 November 2009
Line 181:		Line 181:

	==Re My Guns==		==Re My Guns==
	Thanks. I seem to go more for the classics. I'm not a big fan of Glocks, while they're super reliable and can take a lot of abuse. They're just ugly to me. HK's are not bad looking guns, neither are SIG's but they're pricey. For some the reliability is all that matters, but looks matter to me too. I just picked up a Beretta 92FS Inox a week ago. Whenever the scope for my L1A1 and flash hider for the Mini-14 come in, I'll take some pics of my long guns and the new to me Inox. The only ~~reson~~ I purchased the Inox was my Grandma was needing a larger gun than the .22 Colt Challenger she had. So I traded my 92F for it. I need more revolvers I only have one currently. So maybe two of those will be next purchases. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		Thanks. I seem to go more for the classics. I'm not a big fan of Glocks, while they're super reliable and can take a lot of abuse. They're just ugly to me. HK's are not bad looking guns, neither are SIG's but they're pricey. For some the reliability is all that matters, but looks matter to me too. I just picked up a Beretta 92FS Inox a week ago. Whenever the scope for my L1A1 and flash hider for the Mini-14 come in, I'll take some pics of my long guns and the new to me Inox. The only reason I purchased the Inox was my Grandma was needing a larger gun than the .22 Colt Challenger she had. So I traded my 92F for it. I need more revolvers I only have one currently. So maybe two of those will be next purchases. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
			:I'll take a snap of it. The Colt Woodsman and Challenger look almost the same only the grip is different (could just be the grip panels). You can't see the grip in the screenshot. Browning also made the Challenger. (Browning designed it) --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)