User talk:Greg-Z - Revision history

Pyramid Silent: /* :Broken titles */ new section

2022-09-05T12:57:23Z

:Broken titles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 5 September 2022
Line 499:		Line 499:
	Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? You have to type it in manually in the search bar, you'll know you have it because the you'll see a lock in url bar. For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also be logging you out. We'll move to a 100% https site for everyone next week. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)		Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? You have to type it in manually in the search bar, you'll know you have it because the you'll see a lock in url bar. For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also be logging you out. We'll move to a 100% https site for everyone next week. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
	:If you click the Random page link does it take you to a https version with a lock in the url bar or a http version with a broken lock? For me I don't get a redirect if I manually type https in the url bar and Random page sends me to https with a lock in the url bar. If Random page doesn't send you to https then you may have a 'preferHTTP' cookie that keeps redirecting you to http, you could try clearing cookies in your browser for imfdb. In Firefox if I click the lock there's a dropdown for 'Clear cookies and site data...' --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 17:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)		:If you click the Random page link does it take you to a https version with a lock in the url bar or a http version with a broken lock? For me I don't get a redirect if I manually type https in the url bar and Random page sends me to https with a lock in the url bar. If Random page doesn't send you to https then you may have a 'preferHTTP' cookie that keeps redirecting you to http, you could try clearing cookies in your browser for imfdb. In Firefox if I click the lock there's a dropdown for 'Clear cookies and site data...' --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 17:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

			== :Broken titles ==

			Ok. [[User:Pyramid Silent\|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent\|talk]]) 12:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Bunni: /* Keep me logged in */

2022-09-04T17:07:49Z

Keep me logged in

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 4 September 2022
Line 498:		Line 498:

	Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? You have to type it in manually in the search bar, you'll know you have it because the you'll see a lock in url bar. For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also be logging you out. We'll move to a 100% https site for everyone next week. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)		Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? You have to type it in manually in the search bar, you'll know you have it because the you'll see a lock in url bar. For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also be logging you out. We'll move to a 100% https site for everyone next week. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
			:If you click the Random page link does it take you to a https version with a lock in the url bar or a http version with a broken lock? For me I don't get a redirect if I manually type https in the url bar and Random page sends me to https with a lock in the url bar. If Random page doesn't send you to https then you may have a 'preferHTTP' cookie that keeps redirecting you to http, you could try clearing cookies in your browser for imfdb. In Firefox if I click the lock there's a dropdown for 'Clear cookies and site data...' --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 17:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Bunni: /* Keep me logged in */

2022-09-04T16:29:55Z

Keep me logged in

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 4 September 2022
Line 497:		Line 497:
	== Keep me logged in ==		== Keep me logged in ==

	Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also ~~log~~ you out. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)		Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? You have to type it in manually in the search bar, you'll know you have it because the you'll see a lock in url bar. For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also be logging you out. We'll move to a 100% https site for everyone next week. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Bunni: /* Keep me logged in */ new section

2022-09-04T16:26:48Z

Keep me logged in: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 4 September 2022
Line 494:		Line 494:

	I'd like to reopen the page. If I post in game screenshots of the rest of the weapons, and use the pre-existing version in the discussion section, would that be up to IMFDB standards? Cause other than missing screenshots, I'd want to know what, if anything, else was wrong with it before I reopen it.--[[User:U7355608\|U7355608]] ([[User talk:U7355608\|talk]]) 21:31, 27 May 2022 (EDT)		I'd like to reopen the page. If I post in game screenshots of the rest of the weapons, and use the pre-existing version in the discussion section, would that be up to IMFDB standards? Cause other than missing screenshots, I'd want to know what, if anything, else was wrong with it before I reopen it.--[[User:U7355608\|U7355608]] ([[User talk:U7355608\|talk]]) 21:31, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

			== Keep me logged in ==

			Can you try specifically going to the https://www.imfdb.org version of the site? For me that keeps me logged in on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. If you have restrictive cookie settings or a cookie blocker that might also log you out. --[[User:Bunni\|bunni]] ([[User talk:Bunni\|talk]]) 16:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

U7355608: /* Reopening Watch_Dogs: Legion's page */

2022-05-28T01:31:42Z

Reopening Watch_Dogs: Legion's page

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 28 May 2022
Line 493:		Line 493:
	It says "page was noeffort". The person who made it should have added more screenshots, but to me it had everything else a page would need, it had explanations of how the weapons functioned in game, it included every weapon in game, had an overview section, was formatted perfectly, grammar and spelling were all fine.		It says "page was noeffort". The person who made it should have added more screenshots, but to me it had everything else a page would need, it had explanations of how the weapons functioned in game, it included every weapon in game, had an overview section, was formatted perfectly, grammar and spelling were all fine.

	I'd like to reopen the page. If I post in game screenshots of the rest of the weapons, and use the pre-existing version in the discussion section, would that be up to IMFDB standards? Cause other than missing screenshots, I'd want to know what, if anything, else was wrong with it before I reopen it.		I'd like to reopen the page. If I post in game screenshots of the rest of the weapons, and use the pre-existing version in the discussion section, would that be up to IMFDB standards? Cause other than missing screenshots, I'd want to know what, if anything, else was wrong with it before I reopen it.--[[User:U7355608\|U7355608]] ([[User talk:U7355608\|talk]]) 21:31, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

U7355608: /* Reopening Watch_Dogs: Legion's page */ new section

2022-05-28T01:31:31Z

Reopening Watch_Dogs: Legion's page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 28 May 2022
Line 488:		Line 488:
	== RE: [edit] Categorization of images ==		== RE: [edit] Categorization of images ==
	Got it, thanks Greg-Z! ([[User talk:Gravetracer\|talk]])		Got it, thanks Greg-Z! ([[User talk:Gravetracer\|talk]])

			== Reopening Watch_Dogs: Legion's page ==

			It says "page was noeffort". The person who made it should have added more screenshots, but to me it had everything else a page would need, it had explanations of how the weapons functioned in game, it included every weapon in game, had an overview section, was formatted perfectly, grammar and spelling were all fine.

			I'd like to reopen the page. If I post in game screenshots of the rest of the weapons, and use the pre-existing version in the discussion section, would that be up to IMFDB standards? Cause other than missing screenshots, I'd want to know what, if anything, else was wrong with it before I reopen it.

Gravetracer at 14:05, 25 May 2022

2022-05-25T14:05:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 25 May 2022
Line 485:		Line 485:

	::Nah, the flintlock Charles Moore has a different [https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/storage/app/uploads/public/606/f28/227/606f282277c3f910180419.jpg trigger guard extension] compared to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/d8/Hornblower5-Pistol-10.jpg Hornblower gun]. The Hawken also has different [https://a.allegroimg.com/s1024/0cea60/fe2b33e0426ba0dee690c45eb227 trigger guard and ramrod slot]. Look for some dueling gun with a trigger guard styled like the Hornblower gun, if we manage to find a maker who made this particular design then we could solve it. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 March 2022 (EST)		::Nah, the flintlock Charles Moore has a different [https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/storage/app/uploads/public/606/f28/227/606f282277c3f910180419.jpg trigger guard extension] compared to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/d8/Hornblower5-Pistol-10.jpg Hornblower gun]. The Hawken also has different [https://a.allegroimg.com/s1024/0cea60/fe2b33e0426ba0dee690c45eb227 trigger guard and ramrod slot]. Look for some dueling gun with a trigger guard styled like the Hornblower gun, if we manage to find a maker who made this particular design then we could solve it. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 March 2022 (EST)

			== RE: [edit] Categorization of images ==
			Got it, thanks Greg-Z! ([[User talk:Gravetracer\|talk]])

Nanomat: /* RE: One more curious flintlock pistol */

2022-03-10T01:52:02Z

RE: One more curious flintlock pistol

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 10 March 2022
Line 483:		Line 483:

	:Sawyer's pistols in ''Hornblower: Mutiny'' indeed seem to be dueling guns. I also spent some time researching this and it turns out this is a common design for dueling pistols made by various makers, however, I also didn't manage to find an example with swivel ramrod and/or belt hook. ID-ing them just as dueling pistols should do for now. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:14, 8 March 2022 (EST)		:Sawyer's pistols in ''Hornblower: Mutiny'' indeed seem to be dueling guns. I also spent some time researching this and it turns out this is a common design for dueling pistols made by various makers, however, I also didn't manage to find an example with swivel ramrod and/or belt hook. ID-ing them just as dueling pistols should do for now. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:14, 8 March 2022 (EST)

			::Nah, the flintlock Charles Moore has a different [https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/storage/app/uploads/public/606/f28/227/606f282277c3f910180419.jpg trigger guard extension] compared to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/d8/Hornblower5-Pistol-10.jpg Hornblower gun]. The Hawken also has different [https://a.allegroimg.com/s1024/0cea60/fe2b33e0426ba0dee690c45eb227 trigger guard and ramrod slot]. Look for some dueling gun with a trigger guard styled like the Hornblower gun, if we manage to find a maker who made this particular design then we could solve it. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:52, 9 March 2022 (EST)

Nanomat: /* RE: One more curious flintlock pistol */

2022-03-09T03:14:07Z

RE: One more curious flintlock pistol

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 9 March 2022
Line 481:		Line 481:

	Yeah, it looks like it could be Mle 1733, clearly it doesn't have the typical British lock plate. Though there is something I have never seen on any plate of this style, a bolt or something in the middle of the plate. Maybe an attachment point for a belt hook? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:19, 7 March 2022 (EST)		Yeah, it looks like it could be Mle 1733, clearly it doesn't have the typical British lock plate. Though there is something I have never seen on any plate of this style, a bolt or something in the middle of the plate. Maybe an attachment point for a belt hook? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:19, 7 March 2022 (EST)

			:Sawyer's pistols in ''Hornblower: Mutiny'' indeed seem to be dueling guns. I also spent some time researching this and it turns out this is a common design for dueling pistols made by various makers, however, I also didn't manage to find an example with swivel ramrod and/or belt hook. ID-ing them just as dueling pistols should do for now. --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:14, 8 March 2022 (EST)

Nanomat: /* RE: One more curious flintlock pistol */

2022-03-08T03:20:01Z

RE: One more curious flintlock pistol

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 8 March 2022
Line 480:		Line 480:
	== RE: One more curious flintlock pistol ==		== RE: One more curious flintlock pistol ==

	Yeah, it looks like it could be Mle 1733, clearly it doesn't have the typical British lock plate. Though there is something I have never seen on ~~ant~~ plate of this style, a bolt or something in the middle of the plate. Maybe an attachment point for a belt hook? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:19, 7 March 2022 (EST)		Yeah, it looks like it could be Mle 1733, clearly it doesn't have the typical British lock plate. Though there is something I have never seen on any plate of this style, a bolt or something in the middle of the plate. Maybe an attachment point for a belt hook? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 22:19, 7 March 2022 (EST)