User talk:Gau17 - Revision history

Rockwolf66: /* Much Better */

2010-05-08T19:26:34Z

Much Better

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 8 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
	==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)		==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

	Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)		Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

			Granted. Still The handheld Minigun section needs to get put in in the "cell" format of the Miniguns in film page. That and I'm trying to remember the episode of JAG that has a handheld Minigun in it. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 19:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Rockwolf66: /* Much Better */

2010-05-03T07:13:46Z

Much Better

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 3 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
	==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)		==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
			Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Rockwolf66 at 22:21, 28 April 2010

2010-04-28T22:21:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 28 April 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Much Better==		==Much Better==
	Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
			==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Rockwolf66 at 08:13, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T08:13:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 10 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Uhh==		==Uhh==
	Bootlegs aren't allowed and are going to be deleted. Bootlegs don't belong here. - [[User:Kenny99\|Kenny99]] 02:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)		Bootlegs aren't allowed and are going to be deleted. Bootlegs don't belong here. - [[User:Kenny99\|Kenny99]] 02:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

			==Much Better==
			Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Kenny99: New page: ==Uhh== Bootlegs aren't allowed and are going to be deleted. Bootlegs don't belong here. - ~~~~

2009-07-26T02:29:30Z

New page: ==Uhh== Bootlegs aren't allowed and are going to be deleted. Bootlegs don't belong here. - ~~~~

New page

==Uhh==
Bootlegs aren't allowed and are going to be deleted. Bootlegs don't belong here. - [[User:Kenny99|Kenny99]] 02:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 8 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
	==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)		==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

	Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)		Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

			Granted. Still The handheld Minigun section needs to get put in in the "cell" format of the Miniguns in film page. That and I'm trying to remember the episode of JAG that has a handheld Minigun in it. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 19:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 3 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		Your posts have gotten much better and more observant to details. I'm not finding anything that is technically or factually inaccurate. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 08:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
	==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)		==Ok maybe I was a bit too hasty in reverting everything. Unfortunatly you have a history of posting such nonsense as a minigun geared down to a rate of fire that semiautomatic weapons reach. Plus you are currently adding parts to miniguns that don't exist. I have examined M134 miniguns and the cylinders at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock are mounting lugs and have nothing to do with supressing recoil. That last bit about what you call "Recoil absorbers" is the sort of technical gaf that makes people who do use M134 miniguns go "what the heck". This webpage does get examined by people who are very familiar with various weapons and I do have to say that you have earned a reputation as someone who does not know what they are talking about. Still as i have said above you have gotten alot better at the technical details.[[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
			Sorry about that then. usually my sources are alot better than that. Probably becuase they usually own the weapons i ask them about. [[User:Rockwolf66\|Rockwolf66]] 07:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)